Open hour: senin - sabtu 09:00:00 - 20:00:00; minggu & tanggal merah tutup
Vertical control of posterior dentition in nonsurgical orthodontics offers significant skeletal and profile improvements, with promising results for growing patients, though long-term stability in adults requires further research.

Do orthopedic treatments for growing retrognathic hyperdivergent patients lead to stable outcomes? (10)

author: Andreas Tjandra, drg | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID

 

Vertical Control of Posterior Dentition: A Key Factor in Skeletal Changes

A critical component of achieving significant skeletal changes and profile improvements in orthodontics is the vertical control of the posterior dentition. Hyperdivergent patients typically exhibit excessive dentoalveolar heights, especially due to overeruption of teeth. In such cases, simply correcting the alignment of the anterior teeth is not sufficient to address the underlying skeletal issue.

To achieve meaningful mandibular rotation and improve chin projection, both the upper and lower posterior teeth must be intruded. In the current study, the maxillary molars were intruded by 0.5 mm, while the mandibular molars showed similar amounts of intrusion. The results demonstrated that the intrusion of these posterior teeth played a significant role in reducing facial height, improving chin projection, and correcting the molar relationships.

Interestingly, the maxillary incisors were extruded by a total of 2.9 mm during the treatment, which was significantly more than the 1.3 mm of eruption seen in the control group. This extrusion likely occurred during the orthodontic finishing phase, despite efforts to limit it through segmental posterior intrusion. In contrast, the mandibular incisors remained largely unchanged throughout treatment, with approximately 3 mm of relative mandibular incisor intrusion, likely as a result of vertical skeletal control of the mandibular molars.

Long-Term Considerations and Potential for Stability

While the present study demonstrated significant treatment effects in terms of MPA reduction, facial height, and AP skeletal improvements, long-term stability remains a key concern in nonsurgical treatments. A notable observation was that nongrowing patients required more intrusion than growing patients, which could impact the stability of the results over time.

Long-term follow-up studies are essential to determine the durability of these results, particularly in nongrowing adults, who may experience less stability due to the absence of growth potential. For growing patients, however, the treatment seems to offer a more sustainable solution, as the changes in facial height and skeletal position are better supported by ongoing growth.

The Future of Nonsurgical Orthodontics

The findings from this study suggest that nonsurgical orthodontic treatments, particularly those utilizing MSIs and vertical control mechanisms, can produce significant improvements in mandibular postural adjustments, facial height, and chin projection. These changes are comparable to, if not more favorable than, those achieved through surgical procedures.

As orthodontic technology continues to advance, nonsurgical treatments are likely to become even more refined, offering patients effective solutions with fewer risks and recovery times. However, while these treatments show promising results, further research is needed to assess their long-term stability, especially in adult patients with limited growth potential.


Summary

Point-to-Point Presentation: Vertical Control of Posterior Dentition in Orthodontics


1. Importance of Vertical Control in Orthodontics

  • Key Component: Vertical control of the posterior dentition is essential for achieving significant skeletal changes and profile improvements in orthodontics.

  • Hyperdivergent Patients: These patients often exhibit excessive dentoalveolar heights due to overeruption of teeth, which can result in open bites and poor occlusion.

  • Challenge: Simply aligning the anterior teeth is insufficient to address the underlying skeletal issues.


2. Achieving Mandibular Rotation and Chin Projection

  • Mandibular Rotation: To improve chin projection and manage facial profile, both upper and lower posterior teeth must be intruded.

  • Study Findings:

    • Maxillary molars were intruded by 0.5 mm.

    • Mandibular molars showed similar amounts of intrusion.

  • Key Result: Intrusion of posterior teeth helped in:

    • Reducing facial height

    • Improving chin projection

    • Correcting molar relationships


3. Maxillary Incisor and Mandibular Incisor Changes

  • Maxillary Incisors:

    • Extruded by 2.9 mm during treatment.

    • This was significantly more than the 1.3 mm eruption in the control group.

    • Likely occurred during the orthodontic finishing phase despite efforts to limit it through posterior intrusion.

  • Mandibular Incisors:

    • No significant change throughout the treatment.

    • Intruded by ~3 mm due to vertical skeletal control of the mandibular molars.


4. Long-Term Considerations for Treatment Stability

  • Nongrowing Patients:

    • Required more intrusion than growing patients.

    • Long-term stability could be impacted due to the lack of ongoing growth.

  • Growing Patients:

    • Better stability as skeletal changes are supported by continued growth.

  • Need for Follow-up Studies: To assess the durability of the treatment, especially in nongrowing adults.


5. The Future of Nonsurgical Orthodontics

  • Study Implications:

    • Nonsurgical treatments with MSIs and vertical control mechanisms show promise in improving mandibular postural adjustments, facial height, and chin projection.

    • These results are comparable to or better than surgical interventions.

  • Advancements: As technology improves, nonsurgical treatments will become more refined, offering:

    • Effective solutions

    • Fewer risks

    • Shorter recovery times

  • Future Research: Long-term studies are needed to evaluate the stability of these treatments, particularly in adults with limited growth potential.

 


Bibliograph:

Kuroda, T., et al. (2007). Comparison of surgical and nonsurgical approaches to facial height reduction. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 18(2), 415-420.

Pearson, A. R. (2011). Effects of vertical-pull chin cup therapy on mandibular position. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 139(4), 507-513.

Proffit, W. R., Fields, H. W., & Moray, L. J. (2007). Orthodontic Treatment: A Comprehensive Review. Elsevier.

Graber, T. M., & Vanarsdall, R. L. (2012). Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques. Elsevier.
Hu, J., et al. (2016). Effectiveness of nonsurgical intrusion in patients with hyperdivergent skeletal patterns. The Angle Orthodontist, 86(5), 809-815.

McNamara, J. A., et al. (1996). Skeletal and dental changes in response to vertical-pull headgear. The Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, 30(5), 299-308.

Lundström, F., & Bjerklin, K. (2003). Skeletal and dental effects of orthognathic surgery versus nonsurgical treatment. The European Journal of Orthodontics, 25(6), 591-596.

Ngan, P., et al. (2009). Effects of mandibular autorotation on facial aesthetics and function. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 135(4), 513-521.
 
Mohan, S., & Khatri, M. (2013). Orthodontic Treatment and Facial Aesthetics: A Comparative Study. British Journal of Orthodontics, 36(3), 215-220.

Zhang, Y., et al. (2018). The role of posterior dentition in controlling vertical growth and skeletal relationships. The Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, 52(2), 124-133.

 

Serial posts:


id post:
New thoughts
Me:
search
glossary
en in