Figure 5. Microscopic analysis of contact interfaces. Microscopic observations of the artificial bone-implant and number of debris particles. The small arrows in the panel indicate voids in the implant-bone interface
Figure 5. Microscopic analysis of contact interfaces.
author: Yoko Yamaguchi,Makoto Shiota,Masaki Fujii,Masahiro ShimogishiMotohiro Munakata | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Serial posts:
- Effects of implant thread design on primary stability—a comparison between single- and double-threaded implants in an artificial bone model
- Effects of implant thread design on primary stability (1)
- Effects of implant thread design on primary stability (2)
- Methods : Effects of implant thread design on primary stability
- Results : Effects of implant thread design on primary stability
- Discussion : Effects of implant thread design on primary stability (1)
- Discussion : Effects of implant thread design on primary stability (2)
- Discussion : Effects of implant thread design on primary stability (3)
- Discussion : Effects of implant thread design on primary stability (4)
- Discussion : Effects of implant thread design on primary stability (5)
- Table 1 Dimensions of implants
- Table 2 Insertion torque (IT), removal torque (RT), and ISQ values
- Figure 1. Implant code 12S is similar to a commercially available standard
- Figure 2. Insertion torque (IT), removal torque (RT), and implant stability quotient (ISQ)
- Figure 4. Torque kinetics
- Figure 5. Microscopic analysis of contact interfaces.
- Figure 6. Bone debris at the contact interfaces.