Table 1 List of included studies : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Table 1 List of included studies : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
author: Gowri Sivaramakrishnan, Kannan Sridharan | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Author
Participant
Intervention
Comparator
Outcome
De Souza 2015[8]
120 edentulous patients completely eligible to receive implant-supported overdentures
80 patients received 2 or 4 mini-implants for implant-supported overdentures
40 patients received 2 standard diameter implants for implant-supported overdentures
Patient satisfaction as measured by oral health-related quality of life
Omran M 2013[9]
14 patients completely eligible to receive implant-supported overdentures
7 patients received 4 mini-implants for implant-supported overdentures
7 patients received 2 standard diameter implants for implant-supported overdentures
Clinical evaluation—gingival index, probing depth, radiographic evaluation
Rebeiro AB 2015[10]
120 patients completely eligible to receive implant-supported overdentures
80 patients received 2 or 4 mini-implants for implant-supported overdentures
40 patients received 2 standard diameter implants for implant-supported overdentures
VAS measured post-operative pain and discomfort
Persic S 2016 [11]
122 patients completely eligible to receive implant-supported overdentures
50 patients received 4 mini-implants for implant-supported overdentures
72 patients received 2 standard diameter implants for implant-supported overdentures
Overall patient satisfaction as measured using OHIP-14
Table 1 List of included studies
Serial posts:
-
Abstract : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
-
Review : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
-
Materials and methodology : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
-
Results : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
-
Discussion : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
-
Conclusion : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
-
References : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [1]
-
References : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [2]
-
Acknowledgements : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
-
Author information : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
-
Ethics declarations : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
-
Rights and permissions : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
-
About this article : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
-
Table 1 List of included studies : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
-
Table 2 Grading the strength of evidence : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
-
Fig. 1. PRISMA flow diagram : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant
-
Fig. 2. Risk of bias of the included studies : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant
-
Fig. 3. Forest plot of quality of life. A statistically significant improvement was observed in the quality of life parameter with mini implants than standard implants : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant
| Author | Participant | Intervention | Comparator | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| De Souza 2015[8] | 120 edentulous patients completely eligible to receive implant-supported overdentures | 80 patients received 2 or 4 mini-implants for implant-supported overdentures | 40 patients received 2 standard diameter implants for implant-supported overdentures | Patient satisfaction as measured by oral health-related quality of life |
| Omran M 2013[9] | 14 patients completely eligible to receive implant-supported overdentures | 7 patients received 4 mini-implants for implant-supported overdentures | 7 patients received 2 standard diameter implants for implant-supported overdentures | Clinical evaluation—gingival index, probing depth, radiographic evaluation |
| Rebeiro AB 2015[10] | 120 patients completely eligible to receive implant-supported overdentures | 80 patients received 2 or 4 mini-implants for implant-supported overdentures | 40 patients received 2 standard diameter implants for implant-supported overdentures | VAS measured post-operative pain and discomfort |
| Persic S 2016 [11] | 122 patients completely eligible to receive implant-supported overdentures | 50 patients received 4 mini-implants for implant-supported overdentures | 72 patients received 2 standard diameter implants for implant-supported overdentures | Overall patient satisfaction as measured using OHIP-14 |
Table 1 List of included studies
- Abstract : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Review : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Materials and methodology : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Results : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Discussion : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Conclusion : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- References : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [1]
- References : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [2]
- Acknowledgements : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Author information : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Ethics declarations : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Rights and permissions : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- About this article : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Table 1 List of included studies : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Table 2 Grading the strength of evidence : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Fig. 1. PRISMA flow diagram : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant
- Fig. 2. Risk of bias of the included studies : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant
- Fig. 3. Forest plot of quality of life. A statistically significant improvement was observed in the quality of life parameter with mini implants than standard implants : Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant