Table 2 An overview of the results of the clinical and radiological follow-up investigation (Of: Short implant)
Table 2 An overview of the results of the clinical and radiological follow-up investigation (Of: Short implant)
author: Jonas Lorenz, Maximilian Blume, Tadas Korzinskas, Shahram Ghanaati, Robert A Sader | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
| Patient | Implant-localization (region) | Implant-loss (+/−) | Buccal width of keratinized peri-implant gingiva (mm) | Buccal thickness of keratinized peri-implant gingiva (mm) | Probing depth (mm) at four sites (mb, db, mo, do) | Bleeding on probing (+/−) (per implant) | Marginal bone loss (mm) (mesially and distally) | Recession (mm) | Presence of peri-implant osteolysis (+/−) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 | − | 2 | 2 | 3, 2, 2, 2 | − | 0, 0 | – | − |
| 27 | − | 2 | 2 | 2, 3, 2, 3 | − | 0, 0 | – | − | |
| 16 | − | 3 | 3 | 2, 2, 2, 2 | − | 0, 0.5 | – | − | |
| 2 | 15 | − | 1 | 1 | 3, 3, 2, 2 | − | 1, 1 | – | − |
| 3 | 15 | − | 2 | 3 | 2, 3, 2, 2 | − | 0, 0 | – | − |
| 25 | − | 2 | 2 | 2, 2, 2, 2 | − | 0, 0 | – | − | |
| 4 | 26 | − | 3 | 3 | 3, 2, 2, 2 | − | 0, 0.5 | – | − |
| 27 | − | 2 | 2 | 3, 3, 2, 2 | − | 0.5, 0.5 | – | − | |
| 5 | 14 | − | 3 | 2 | 2, 2, 3, 2 | − | 0, 0.5 | – | − |
| 15 | − | 2 | 2 | 2, 3, 2, 2 | − | 0.5, 1 | – | − | |
| 25 | − | 2 | 2 | 2, 2, 1, 2 | − | 0, 0.5 | – | − | |
| 6 | 15 | − | 3 | 2 | 1, 1, 2, 1 | − | 0, 0 | – | − |
| 24 | − | 3 | 2 | 2, 2, 3, 3 | − | 0, 1 | – | − | |
| 7 | 24 | − | 1 | 1 | 2, 3, 2, 2 | − | 0.5, 0.5 | – | − |
| 26 | − | 1 | 1 | 3, 3, 3, 3 | − | 0.5, 0.5 | – | − | |
| 8 | 16 | − | 2 | 2 | 3, 3, 4, 4 | − | 1, 1 | – | − |
| 26 | − | 2 | 2 | 3, 4, 3, 4 | − | 1, 1 | – | − | |
| 9 | 16 | − | 1 | 1 | 3, 4, 3, 3 | − | 0.5, 0.5 | 1 | − |
| 26 | − | 1 | 1 | 3, 3, 3, 3 | − | 0.5, 0.5 | 1 | − | |
| 10 | 16 | − | 2 | 2 | 3, 3, 4, 4 | + | 1, 1 | – | − |
| 17 | − | 2 | 1 | 3, 3, 4, 3 | + | 1, 1.5 | – | − | |
| 11 | 23 | − | 1 | 1 | 4, 3, 3, 5 | + | 1, 1 | 1 | − |
| 24 | − | 1 | 1 | 5, 4, 2, 3 | + | 1, 1 | 1 | − | |
| 12 | 16 | − | 2 | 2 | 2, 2, 2, 2 | − | 0, 0.5 | – | − |
| 17 | − | 2 | 2 | 2, 3, 2, 2 | − | 0.5, 0.5 | – | − | |
| 26 | − | 2 | 2 | 2, 2, 2, 2 | − | 0, 0 | – | − | |
| 13 | 16 | − | 2 | 2 | 2, 3, 2, 2 | − | 0, 1 | – | − |
| 17 | − | 2 | 2 | 2, 2, 2, 3 | − | 1, 1 | – | − | |
| 14 | 25 | − | 3 | 2 | 2,1,1,2 | − | 0, 0.5 | – | − |
| Total/mean: | 30 | 0 | 2.0 mm (1–3 mm) | 1.8 mm (1–3 mm) | 2.5 mm (1–5 mm) | 13.3% of implants |
0.5 mm (0–1.5 mm) mesially: 0.4 mm; distally: 0.6 mm | 13.3% of implants | 0 |
Table 2 An overview of the results of the clinical and radiological follow-up investigation
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Short implants in the posterior maxilla to avoid sinus augmentation procedure: 5-year results from a retrospective cohort study
- Introduction : Short implants in the posterior maxilla to avoid sinus augmentation procedure: 5-year results from a retrospective cohort study [1]
- Introduction : Short implants in the posterior maxilla to avoid sinus augmentation procedure: 5-year results from a retrospective cohort study [2]
- Materials and methods : Short implants in the posterior maxilla to avoid sinus augmentation procedure: 5-year results from a retrospective cohort study [1]
- Materials and methods : Short implants in the posterior maxilla to avoid sinus augmentation procedure: 5-year results from a retrospective cohort study [2]
- Materials and methods : Short implants in the posterior maxilla to avoid sinus augmentation procedure: 5-year results from a retrospective cohort study [3]
- Results : Short implants in the posterior maxilla to avoid sinus augmentation procedure: 5-year results from a retrospective cohort study [1]
- Results : Short implants in the posterior maxilla to avoid sinus augmentation procedure: 5-year results from a retrospective cohort study [2]
- Discussion : Short implants in the posterior maxilla to avoid sinus augmentation procedure: 5-year results from a retrospective cohort study [1]
- Discussion : Short implants in the posterior maxilla to avoid sinus augmentation procedure: 5-year results from a retrospective cohort study [2]
- Conclusion : Short implants in the posterior maxilla to avoid sinus augmentation procedure: 5-year results from a retrospective cohort study
- Abbreviations : Short implants in the posterior maxilla to avoid sinus augmentation procedure: 5-year results from a retrospective cohort study
- References : Short implants in the posterior maxilla to avoid sinus augmentation procedure: 5-year results from a retrospective cohort study [1]
- References : Short implants in the posterior maxilla to avoid sinus augmentation procedure: 5-year results from a retrospective cohort study [2]
- Acknowledgements : Short implants in the posterior maxilla to avoid sinus augmentation procedure: 5-year results from a retrospective cohort study
- Author information : Short implants in the posterior maxilla to avoid sinus augmentation procedure: 5-year results from a retrospective cohort study [1]
- Author information : Short implants in the posterior maxilla to avoid sinus augmentation procedure: 5-year results from a retrospective cohort study [2]
- Ethics declarations : Short implants in the posterior maxilla to avoid sinus augmentation procedure: 5-year results from a retrospective cohort study
- Rights and permissions : Short implants in the posterior maxilla to avoid sinus augmentation procedure: 5-year results from a retrospective cohort study
- About this article : Short implants in the posterior maxilla to avoid sinus augmentation procedure: 5-year results from a retrospective cohort study
- Table 1 An overview of the patient information, implant localization, and implant data from the retrospectively investigated implants (Of: Short implant)
- Table 2 An overview of the results of the clinical and radiological follow-up investigation (Of: Short implant)
- Fig. 1. The clinical images of patient 4, with implant-supported single crowns in regions 26 and 27. No signs of a peri-implant infection, mucositis, peri-implantitis, or marginal bone loss were detected. a Occlusal view. b Left-side view. c Orthopantogram. d Close-up radiographic view : Short implant