Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Table 2 Profile of patients
author: Choknapa Tirachaimongkol,Peraphan Pothacharoen,Peter A Reichart, Pathawee Khongkhunthian | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Patient no.
Age
Sex
Positiona
Bone qualityb
1
34
Female
46
3
2
38
Female
36
3
3
43
Female
37
3
4
64
Male
46
2
5
30
Female
47
3
6
48
Female
36
2
7
57
Male
36
3
8
28
Female
46
3
9
33
Male
46
2
10
49
Female
46
3
Serial posts:
-
Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers
-
Background : Relation between the stability of dental implants (1)
-
Background : Relation between the stability of dental implants (2)
-
Methods : Relation between the stability of dental implants (1)
-
Methods : Relation between the stability of dental implants (2)
-
Methods : Relation between the stability of dental implants (3)
-
Methods : Relation between the stability of dental implants (4)
-
Results : Relation between the stability of dental implants
-
Discussion : Relation between the stability of dental implants (1)
-
Discussion : Relation between the stability of dental implants (2)
-
Discussion : Relation between the stability of dental implants (3)
-
Reference : Relation between the stability of dental implants
-
Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Table 2 Profile of patients
-
Table 3 ISQ values according to gender and bone quality
-
Table 4 Crevicular fluid volume
-
Table 5 Crevicular fluid ALP and OC levels
-
Figure 1. Timeline of the clinical study
-
Figure 2. Change in the mean ISQ values over time
-
Figure 3. Change in the median values
-
Figure 4. Change in the median values of the ALP level over time
-
Figure 5. Change in the median values of the OC level over time
-
Figure 6. There were weakly significant and positive correlations
-
Figure 7. Comparison between biomarker levels & ISQ values
-
Figure 8. There were moderately significant and positive correlations
| Patient no. | Age | Sex | Positiona | Bone qualityb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | Female | 46 | 3 |
| 2 | 38 | Female | 36 | 3 |
| 3 | 43 | Female | 37 | 3 |
| 4 | 64 | Male | 46 | 2 |
| 5 | 30 | Female | 47 | 3 |
| 6 | 48 | Female | 36 | 2 |
| 7 | 57 | Male | 36 | 3 |
| 8 | 28 | Female | 46 | 3 |
| 9 | 33 | Male | 46 | 2 |
| 10 | 49 | Female | 46 | 3 |
- Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers
- Background : Relation between the stability of dental implants (1)
- Background : Relation between the stability of dental implants (2)
- Methods : Relation between the stability of dental implants (1)
- Methods : Relation between the stability of dental implants (2)
- Methods : Relation between the stability of dental implants (3)
- Methods : Relation between the stability of dental implants (4)
- Results : Relation between the stability of dental implants
- Discussion : Relation between the stability of dental implants (1)
- Discussion : Relation between the stability of dental implants (2)
- Discussion : Relation between the stability of dental implants (3)
- Reference : Relation between the stability of dental implants
- Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria
- Table 2 Profile of patients
- Table 3 ISQ values according to gender and bone quality
- Table 4 Crevicular fluid volume
- Table 5 Crevicular fluid ALP and OC levels
- Figure 1. Timeline of the clinical study
- Figure 2. Change in the mean ISQ values over time
- Figure 3. Change in the median values
- Figure 4. Change in the median values of the ALP level over time
- Figure 5. Change in the median values of the OC level over time
- Figure 6. There were weakly significant and positive correlations
- Figure 7. Comparison between biomarker levels & ISQ values
- Figure 8. There were moderately significant and positive correlations