Table 3 Statistical analysis comparing measured distances (A-B and C-D) among different groups in buccal and lingual sites : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant tissues in implants immediately exposed or submerged in fresh extraction and healed sites: a histological study in dogs
Table 3 Statistical analysis comparing measured distances (A-B and C-D) among different groups in buccal and lingual sites : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant tissues in implants immediately exposed or submerged in fresh extraction and healed sites: a histological study in dogs
author: Sergio Alexandre Gehrke, Leana Kathleen Bragana, Eugenio Velasco-Ortega, Jos Luis Calvo-Guirado | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
| Group | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Friedman test | Friedman statistic | ||
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||||
|
Crestal bone loss (A-B distance) | Buccal | 1.88 ± 0.42a | 2.23 ± 0.33bc | 0.34 ± 0.30ab | 0.69 ± 0.21c | P < 0.0001 | 26.45 |
| Lingual | 0.93 ± 0.41d | 1.41 ± 0.38ef | 031 ± 0.27de | 0.57 ± 0.32f | P < 0.0001 | 21.43 | |
|
Tissue thickness (C-D distance) | Buccal | 0.70 ± 0,.25gh | 0.75 ± 0.25 | 1.34 ± 0.35g | 1.36 ± 0.46h | P = 0.0005 | 17.79 |
| Lingual | 0.95 ± 0.30i | 1.01 ± 0.33j | 1.82 ± 0.41ij | 1.68 ± 0.39 | P = 0.0003 | 18.68 | |
Table 3 Statistical analysis comparing measured distances (A-B and C-D) among different groups in buccal and lingual sites
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant tissues in implants immediately exposed or submerged in fresh extraction and healed sites: a histological study in dogs
- Background : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant tissues in implants immediately exposed or submerged in fresh extraction and healed sites: a histological study in dogs [1]
- Background : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant tissues in implants immediately exposed or submerged in fresh extraction and healed sites: a histological study in dogs [2]
- Methods : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant tissues in implants immediately exposed or submerged in fresh extraction and healed sites: a histological study in dogs [1]
- Methods : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant tissues in implants immediately exposed or submerged in fresh extraction and healed sites: a histological study in dogs [2]
- Methods : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant tissues in implants immediately exposed or submerged in fresh extraction and healed sites: a histological study in dogs [3]
- Results : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant tissues in implants immediately exposed or submerged in fresh extraction and healed sites: a histological study in dogs
- Discussion : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant tissues in implants immediately exposed or submerged in fresh extraction and healed sites: a histological study in dogs [1]
- Discussion : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant tissues in implants immediately exposed or submerged in fresh extraction and healed sites: a histological study in dogs [2]
- Discussion : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant tissues in implants immediately exposed or submerged in fresh extraction and healed sites: a histological study in dogs [3]
- Conclusions : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant tissues in implants immediately exposed or submerged in fresh extraction and healed sites: a histological study in dogs
- References : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant tissues in implants immediately exposed or submerged in fresh extraction and healed sites: a histological study in dogs [1]
- References : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant tissues in implants immediately exposed or submerged in fresh extraction and healed sites: a histological study in dogs [2]
- References : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant tissues in implants immediately exposed or submerged in fresh extraction and healed sites: a histological study in dogs [3]
- References : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant tissues in implants immediately exposed or submerged in fresh extraction and healed sites: a histological study in dogs [4]
- References : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant tissues in implants immediately exposed or submerged in fresh extraction and healed sites: a histological study in dogs [5]
- Author information : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant tissues in implants immediately exposed or submerged in fresh extraction and healed sites: a histological study in dogs
- Ethics declarations : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant tissues in implants immediately exposed or submerged in fresh extraction and healed sites: a histological study in dogs
- Rights and permissions : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant tissues in implants immediately exposed or submerged in fresh extraction and healed sites: a histological study in dogs
- About this article : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant tissues in implants immediately exposed or submerged in fresh extraction and healed sites: a histological study in dogs
- Table 1 Mean, median, standard deviation, and standard error for each group evaluated for lingual as well as buccal sites of the crestal bone height (in mm) for all groups : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant tissues in implants immediately exposed or submerged in fresh extraction and healed sites: a histological study in dogs
- Table 2 Mean, median, standard deviation, and standard error for each group evaluated for lingual as well as buccal sites of the tissue thickness (in mm) for all groups : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant tissues in implants immediately exposed or submerged in fresh extraction and healed sites: a histological study in dogs
- Table 3 Statistical analysis comparing measured distances (A-B and C-D) among different groups in buccal and lingual sites : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant tissues in implants immediately exposed or submerged in fresh extraction and healed sites: a histological study in dogs
- Fig. 1. Image of the implant (a) and surface (b) used in the present study : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant
- Fig. 2. Parameters measured in each group. Crestal bone loss is the distance between the implant collar (A) and the first bone contact of the crestal bone (B) = A-B bone height; and, the tissue thickness that is the distance from the implant collar (C) to the more external portion of the tissues (D) = C-D tissue thickness. Picrosirius red staining. Original magnification × 16 : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant
- Fig. 3. Images of groups 1 and 2 representing the implants place in fresh sockets sites. Picrosirius red staining. Original magnification × 4 : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant
- Fig. 4. Images of groups 3 and 4 representing the implants place in healed alveolar sites. Picrosirius red staining. Original magnification × 4 : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant
- Fig. 5. Graph comparing the data of buccal (B) and lingual (L) measured the A-B distance (bone height). Group 1 = implant installed in fresh extraction and submerged; group 2 = implants in fresh extraction and immediately exposed; group 3 = implants installed in healed site and submerged; and group 4 = implants in healed site and immediately exposed : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant
- Fig. 6. Graph comparing the data of buccal (B) and lingual (L) measured the C-D distance (tissue thickness). Group 1 = implant installed in fresh extraction and submerged; group 2 = implants in fresh extraction and immediately exposed; group 3 = implants installed in healed site and submerged; and group 4 = implants in healed site and immediately exposed : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant
- Fig. 7. Multiple graphs comparing A-B distance (height bone) (a) and the C-D distance (tissue thickness) (b) among different groups. Differences between groups were assessed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001). 1 = (group 1) implant installed in fresh extraction and submerged; 2 = (group 2) implants in fresh extraction and immediately exposed; 3 = (group 3) implants installed in healed site and submerged; and 4 = (group 4) implants in healed site and immediately exposed : Evaluation of dimensional behavior of peri-implant