Open hour: senin - sabtu 09:00:00 - 20:00:00; minggu & tanggal merah tutup
Table 5 Average differences in BoP, SoP, and PPD between the control and test group at 3-month follow-up

Table 5 Average differences in BoP, SoP, and PPD between the control and test group at 3-month follow-up

author: Diederik F M Hentenaar, Yvonne C M De Waal, Hans Strooker, Henny J A Meijer, Arie-Jan Van Winkelhoff, Gerry M Raghoebar | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID

Table 5 Average differences in BoP, SoP, and PPD between the control and test group at 3-month follow-up

Outcome variable Crude modela
β (95% CI)		 p value Adjusted modelb
β (95% CI)		 p-value
% Sites BoP
% Sites SoP
Mean PPD		 16.2 (−7.9 to 40.3)
0.0 (−10.9 to 10.9)
0.6 (−0.6 to 1.8)		 0.743
1.000
0.205		 7.9 (−16.4 to 32.3)
0.7 (−10.1 to 11.4)
0.2 (−1.0 to 1.3)		 0.821
0.882
0.470
  1. The reference category for intervention effect is the control group. The regression coefficients (β) indicate the average differences in clinical outcomes between the control and test group at 3-month follow-up
  2. BoP bleeding on probing, SoP suppuration on probing, PPD probing pocket depth, 95% CI 95% confidence interval
  3. aAdjusted for baseline values
  4. bAdjusted for baseline values, smoking, and mean bone loss at baseline

Serial posts:

Share: Posted 2021-02-12 08:50:10
Peri-implantitis Decontamination Dental implants Surgery Microbiology
id post:
New thoughts
Me:
search
glossary
en in