Comparison of RFA values immediately following implant placement through three months follow-up in magnetic and non-magnetic side using repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc test.
Table/ Fig-7. Comparison of RFA values immediately
author: Andreas Tjandra | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
[Table/Fig-7]:
Comparison of RFA values immediately following implant placement through three months follow-up in magnetic and non-magnetic side using repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc test.
Mean
SD
p-value
Post-hoc test
MS 0 day
68.70
4.57
<0.001
3 > 2 > 1 > 0
MS 1 month
73.25
4.52
MS 2 month
76.05
4.26
MS 3 month
78.95
3.50
NMS 0 day
68.60
4.74
<0.001
2 > 1, 0
3 > 2, 1, 0
NMS 1 month
68.45
4.46
NMS 2 month
72.05
4.84
NMS 3 Month
74.45
3.83
Serial posts:
-
Table/ Fig-7. Comparison of RFA values immediately
[Table/Fig-7]:
Comparison of RFA values immediately following implant placement through three months follow-up in magnetic and non-magnetic side using repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc test.
| Mean | SD | p-value | Post-hoc test | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS 0 day | 68.70 | 4.57 | <0.001 | 3 > 2 > 1 > 0 |
| MS 1 month | 73.25 | 4.52 | ||
| MS 2 month | 76.05 | 4.26 | ||
| MS 3 month | 78.95 | 3.50 | ||
| NMS 0 day | 68.60 | 4.74 | <0.001 | 2 > 1, 0 3 > 2, 1, 0 |
| NMS 1 month | 68.45 | 4.46 | ||
| NMS 2 month | 72.05 | 4.84 | ||
| NMS 3 Month | 74.45 | 3.83 |
- Table/ Fig-7. Comparison of RFA values immediately