Background: Long transmaxillary implants (1)
Background
The introduction of osseointegrated implants is considered one of the greatest breakthroughs in dentistry [4]. Dental implants have been used in edentulous jaws to improve the retention and stability of complete dentures. Attachment to implants, in addition to improving stability and functional aspects, increases patient satisfaction [7, 8]. In addition, implant connection improves neuromuscular activity, thereby improving masticatory function in edentulous patients [17]. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that individuals with implants may achieve double of the masticatory forces compared with those with conventional dentures [18].
Several factors should be considered for the rehabilitation of edentulous patients, particularly those with the severely resorbed or resected maxilla, such as the bone quality and quantity, as well as the condition of the soft tissues [11]. Zygomatic implants have been shown to provide a stable and predictable alternative for the rehabilitation of patients with severe maxillary bone loss [13]. Patient-related factors such as mental and oral health, esthetic demands, and treatment perceptions should be equally considered [15]. Tooth loss may impair individuals’ lives, particularly causing psychological effects. These include lack of confidence and self-esteem, avoiding laughing in public, or even socializing in general [15].
The term “oral-health-related quality of life” is now extensively used and accepted worldwide [12]. The influence of dentures and dental implants on the quality of life (OHRQoL) related to the oral health of the patient can guide the clinician to provide the best treatment plan. Thus, the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)-14 questionnaire allows the translation of patients’ perceptions and expectations [1].
Considering that dental implants may improve OHRQoL, this retrospective case series aimed to evaluate the OHRQoL of patients with atrophic jaws, who reported for placement of long transmaxillary implants and prosthetic rehabilitation.
Serial posts:
- Long transmaxillary implants
- Background: Long transmaxillary implants (1)
- Materials and methods: Long transmaxillary implants
- Materials and methods: Long transmaxillary implants (2)
- Materials and methods: Long transmaxillary implants (3)
- Results: Long transmaxillary implants
- Discussion: Long transmaxillary implants
- References: Long transmaxillary implants
- Figure 1. Schematic drawing of the transmaxillary implant
- Figure 2. Maxillary computed tomography. a Axial view. b Coronal view
- Figure 3. Surgical guide
- Figure 4. Insertion of the implant
- Figure 5. Mini-pillar guide
- Figure 6. Tomographic scan of the follow-up
- Figure 7. Panoramic radiography of the follow-up
- Figure 8. Final aspect
- Table 1 Comparison of OHIP-14