Backgrounds : Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis [1]
Mandelbrot introduced fractals to describe his observation of shapes in nature, such as curves, surfaces, disconnected “dust,” and odd shapes. The word fractal originates from the Latin word “fractus,” which means broken. By using fractal mathematics, several studies have analyzed various fractal patterns in the human body. Fractal analysis is a mathematical method of describing complex shapes and structural patterns of the nature and is expressed numerically as fractal dimension [1, 2]. Trabeculae are thin columns with numerous large spaces that give a honeycomb or spongy appearance of cancellous bone, which is also called trabecular bone or spongy bone [3]. Previously, fractal analysis has been reported as a useful method to detect various diseases that affect the trabecular bone structure [4,5,6]. Especially in the field of dentistry, studies have indicated that fractal analysis by the box counting method can successfully evaluate trabecular changes in the mandible of patients with osteoporosis [7,8,9] and periodontal diseases [10] and in lactating women [11]. Furthermore, studies have been conducted to determine the changes in trabecular bone induced by surrounding bone tissues of implants [12,13,14,15].
Many studies have examined the effect of fractal analysis on image acquisition parameters [16, 17]. Although some studies have stated that fractal measurement of trabecular bone microstructures is affected by exposure time and noise, most studies support the belief that fractal measurement is relatively affected by imaging parameters but do not lead to a significant difference [18, 19]. One study that investigated the diagnostic imaging of the trabecular bone structure of oral implants by using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) reported the highest accuracy of the measurement of fractal analysis. This study also highlighted the disadvantage of CBCT with regard to its accessibility and cost in dental clinical practice; however, it emphasized the practicality and accessibility of panoramic and periapical dental radiographs [20]. Fractal analysis can be performed on nonstandardized dental radiographs to assess pathological changes in bone or to assess the quality of peri-implant bone [17, 19, 21].
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis
- Backgrounds : Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis [1]
- Backgrounds : Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis [2]
- Materials and methods : Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis [1]
- Materials and methods : Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis [2]
- Results : Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis
- Discussion : Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis [1]
- Discussion : Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis [2]
- Conclusion : Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis
- Availability of data and materials : Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis
- Abbreviations : Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis
- References : Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis [1]
- References : Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis [2]
- References : Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis [3]
- Acknowledgements : Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis
- Funding : Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis
- Author information : Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis
- Ethics declarations : Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis
- Additional information : Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis
- Rights and permissions : Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis
- About this article : Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis
- Table 1 Distribution and description of FD1 and FD2 values, crown-implant ratios, and sex difference between the implant failure and success groups : Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular
- Table 2 Mean fractal dimension (FD) values before and after implant insertion : Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis
- Fig. 1. Fractal dimension values measured from the same area of interest on each panoramic radiograph over five different time intervals are shown in the figure. FD0, fractal dimension 0 (preoperative); FD1, fractal dimension 1 (0–1 months of follow-up); FD2, fractal dimension 2 (1–3 months of follow-up); FD3, fractal dimension 3 (6–12 months of follow-up); FD4, fractal dimension 4 (12 + months of follow-up) : Evaluation of the peri-implant
- Fig. 2. Region of interests (ROIs) were selected arbitrarily in a preoperative radiographic image and b a follow-up radiographic image : Evaluation of the peri-implant
- Fig. 3. Fractal analysis stages. a Selected region of interest (ROI). b Cropped and duplicated version of ROI. c Addition of Gaussian filter. d Subtraction. e Addition of 128 pixels. f Binarized version. g Eroded version. h Dilated version. i Inverted version j Skeletonization : Evaluation of the peri-implant
- Fig. 4. The crown-implant ratio measurement showing a the length of the crown (red line) and b the length of the implant (red line) : Evaluation of the peri-implant
- Fig. 5. Pie charts shows the distribution of the demographic datas of the patients : Evaluation of the peri-implant
- Fig. 6. Pie chart shows the distribution of loaded implants prosthetic restorations : Evaluation of the peri-implant
- Fig. 7. The box plot shows the distribution of age between the sex groups : Evaluation of the peri-implant