However, no comparable or identical trials utilizing our implant were discovered in the literature. Thus, the outcomes were contrasted with those of the literature, which used the same approach and procedure but a different implant system. A single tooth replacement and a reduced sample size were used in the study. Comparing the implant to other globally recognized (such as Nobel Biocare) systems, it is cost-effective. However, in order to definitively forecast the success rate, our study calls for long-term research with a sizable sample size, repeated replacements, and multicentric randomized blind investigations.

Conclusion

Single-tooth implant restoration using a two-stage surgical approach is a viable therapeutic option for mandibular first molar restoration. However, these results were achieved after a six-year follow-up period, although with a lower sample size. A large sample size with a multicenter randomized trail employing split mouth and comparison is needed for confidently predicting success rates.