Methods : Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implants after long-term chewing simulation [1]
Twenty-five PICN crowns (Vita Enamic, Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany) for premolars were produced using CAD/CAM technology and polished with the Vita Enamic Polishing Set Technical (Vita Zahnfabrik) as recommended by the manufacturer. All crowns were bonded to identical one-piece zirconia testing implants. The implants were turned from pre-sintered zirconia blocks (VITA In-Ceram® 2000 YZ–55, VITA Zahnfabrik) by the faculty of physics and geosciences at the University of Leipzig. Subsequently, the implants were sintered in a dental laboratory. The abutment had a cone angle of 3 °, while the length of the implant totaled up to 21.5 mm. The abutment length was 6 mm. The thread was conceived schematically.
Twenty of the specimens belonged to the experimental group (n = 20) and underwent mechanical loading and wear behavior tests, whereas five of the specimens (n = 5) only underwent the pull-off tests.
Five specimens fit into the chewing simulator which is why five specimens were prepared at a time. Therefore, four rounds of CS were performed.
All steps of the bonding procedure followed the manufacturer’s instructions: the bonding surface of the crown was degreased with alcohol and conditioned with 5 % hydrofluoric acid gel for 60 s (Vita Ceramics Etch, Vita Zahnfabrik). The hydrofluoric acid gel was removed with water spray and the bonding surface was dried for 20 s. Conditioning of the bonding surface of the implant was ensured by sandblasting with aluminum oxide (Al2O3) 110 μm at 1 bar and cleaning with alcohol. After that, a bonding agent (Scotchbond Universal, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) was applied to the surfaces to bond the crown and the implant and both dried with air. The crowns were adhesively bonded (RelyX™ Ultimate, 3M ESPE) to the one-piece zirconia implants. Photopolymerization of the luting agent was carried out by a dental curing light for 40 s on each surface.
All specimens were embedded in acrylic resin (Technovit 4000, Heraeus Kulzer GmbH, Wehrheim, Germany) with a parallelometer for the exact vertical orientation. Epoxy was prepared according to manufacturer’s data, and the specimens were embedded directly into the sample holder of the chewing simulator. Figure 1 shows a luted crown on an embedded implant ready for CS.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implants after long-term chewing simulation
- Background : Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implants after long-term chewing simulation
- Methods : Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implants after long-term chewing simulation [1]
- Methods : Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implants after long-term chewing simulation [2]
- Methods : Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implants after long-term chewing simulation [3]
- Results : Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implants after long-term chewing simulation
- Discussion : Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implants after long-term chewing simulation [1]
- Discussion : Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implants after long-term chewing simulation [2]
- Discussion : Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implants after long-term chewing simulation [3]
- Conclusions : Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implants after long-term chewing simulation
- Abbreviations : Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implants after long-term chewing simulation
- References : Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implants after long-term chewing simulation [1]
- References : Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implants after long-term chewing simulation [2]
- Acknowledgements : Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implants after long-term chewing simulation
- Author information : Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implants after long-term chewing simulation
- Ethics declarations : Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implants after long-term chewing simulation
- Rights and permissions : Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implants after long-term chewing simulation
- About this article : Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implants after long-term chewing simulation
- Table 1 Micro-CT scanning parameters of the replicas before and after CS : Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implants after long-term chewing simulation
- Table 2 Mean (standard deviation) of assessed parameters : Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implants after long-term chewing simulation
- Table 3 Stability of conditions across four CS rounds : Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implants after long-term chewing simulation
- Fig. 1. Luted crown on embedded implant before chewing simulation : Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implant
- Fig. 2. Four replicas on specimen stubs and foam pellets in the sample holder of the Micro-CT : Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implant
- Fig. 3. Area of abrasion (yellow surface) and maximum vertical wear (arrow) : Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implant
- Fig. 4. Luting agent located mostly in the crown (a) and only sparsely on the implant (b). A crown fragment is remaining on the implant : Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implant
- Fig. 5. SEM images of the mesial margin of abrasion under topography contrast (a) and material contrast (b) : Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implant