References : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to 7-year
Krennmair G, Seemann R, Weinlander M, Piehslinger E. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26(3):598–606.
Slot W, Raghoebar GM, Cune MS, Vissink A, Meijer HJA. Four or six implants in the maxillary posterior region to support an overdenture: 5-year results from a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(2):169–77.
Hjalmarsson L, Gheisarifar M, Jemt T. A systematic review of survival of single implants as presented in longitudinal studies with a follow-up of at least 10 years. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2016;9(Suppl 1):S155–62.
Ioannidis A, Heierle L, Hammerle CHF, Husler J, Jung RE, Thoma DS. Prospective randomized controlled clinical study comparing two types of two-piece dental implants supporting fixed reconstructions-results at 5 years of loading. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(11):1126–33.
Eghbali A, De Bruyn H, De Rouck T, Cleymaet R, Wyn I, Cosyn J. Single implant treatment in healing versus healed sites of the anterior maxilla: a clinical and radiographic evaluation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(3):336–46.
French D, Larjava H, Ofec R. Retrospective cohort study of 4591 Straumann implants in private practice setting, with up to 10-year follow-up. Part 1: multivariate survival analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(11):1345–54.
Cosyn J, Raes S, De Meyer S, Raes F, Buyl R, Coomans D, et al. An analysis of the decision-making process for single implant treatment in general practice. J Clin Periodontol. 2012;39(2):166–72.
Al-Nawas B, Domagala P, Fragola G, Freiberger P, Ortiz-Vigon A, Rousseau P, et al. A prospective noninterventional study to evaluate survival and success of reduced diameter implants made from titanium-zirconium alloy. J Oral Implantol. 2015;41(4):e118–25.
Beschnidt SM, Cacaci C, Dedeoglu K, Hildebrand D, Hulla H, Iglhaut G, et al. Implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5-year results of a non-interventional study using CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants with or without platform-switching abutments. Int J Implant Dent. 2018;4(1):33.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to 7-year
- Introduction : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to 7-year
- Introduction : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to 7-year
- Methods : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to 7-year
- Methods : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to 7-year
- Methods : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to 7-year
- Results : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to 7-year
- Results : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to 7-year
- Discussion : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to 7-year
- Discussion : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to 7-year
- Discussion : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to 7-year
- Conclusions : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to 7-year
- Availability of data and materials : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter
- Abbreviations : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to 7-year
- References : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to 7-year
- References : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to 7-year
- References : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to 7-year
- References : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to 7-year
- References : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to 7-year
- Acknowledgements : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to
- Funding : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to 7-year
- Author information : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to
- Ethics declarations : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to
- Additional information : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up
- Rights and permissions : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up
- About this article : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to
- Table 1 Dropouts over observation time : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational
- Table 2 Demography of study population : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational
- Table 3 Mean crestal bone level changes in mm : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational
- Fig. 1. Study flow-chart: assessments and reason for dropouts. Study visits were done according to standard procedures in the respective study centers. Blue, mandatory visits; gray, optional visits : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant
- Fig. 2. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival rate : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant
- Fig. 3. Standardized peri-apical radiographs representing the bone level changes at the implant level: immediately post insertion (a), at loading (abutment/crown placement) (b), and at 5-year post-loading (c) : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant
- Fig. 4. Soft tissue parameters at 5-year post-loading. a Plaque index: score 0, no plaque detected; score 1, plaque only recognized by running a probe across the smooth marginal surface of the implant; score 2, plaque seen by the naked eye; score 3, abundance of soft matter. b Sulcus bleeding index: score 0, no bleeding when a periodontal probe was passed along the gingival margin adjacent to the implant; score 1, isolated bleeding spot visible; score 2, blood formed a confluent red line on margin; score 3, heavy or profuse bleeding. c Oral hygiene assessed per patient : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant
- Fig. 5. PROMs over 5 years: improvement of satisfaction from loading to study end : Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant