Open hour: senin - sabtu 09:00:00 - 20:00:00; minggu & tanggal merah tutup
References : Comparative evaluation among laser-treated, machined, and sandblasted/acid-etched implant surfaces: an in vivo histologic analysis on sheep [3]

References : Comparative evaluation among laser-treated, machined, and sandblasted/acid-etched implant surfaces: an in vivo histologic analysis on sheep [3]

author: I De Tullio, M Berardini, D Di Iorio, F Perfetti, G Perfetti | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID

Piattelli A, Manzon L, Scarano A, Paolantonio M, Piattelli M. Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of the bone response to machined and sandblasted titanium implants: an experimental study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13:805–10.

Lee JT, Cho SA. Biomechanical evaluation of laser-etched Ti implant surfaces vs. chemically modified SLA Ti implant surfaces: Removal torque and resonance frequency analysis in rabbit tibias. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;61:299–307.

Sinjari B, Traini T, Caputi S, Mortellaro C, Scarano A. Evaluation of fibrin clot attachment on titanium laser-conditioned surface using scanning electron microscopy. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29:2277–81.

Di Giulio M, Traini T, Sinjari B, Nostro A, Caputi S, Cellini L. Porphyromonas gingivalis biofilm formation in different titanium surfaces, an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(7):918–25.

Download references

Serial posts:


id post:
New thoughts
Me:
search
glossary
en in