References : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [1]
Agarwal G, Thomas R, Mehta D. Postextraction maintenance of the alveolar ridge: rationale and review. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2012;33:320–324, 326. quiz 327, 336.
Horvath A, Mardas N, Mezzomo LA, Needleman IG, Donos N. Alveolar ridge preservation. A systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17:341–63.
Buser D, Dula K, Belser U, Hirt HP, Berthold H. Localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration. 1. Surgical procedure in the maxilla. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1993;13:29–45.
Simion M, Jovanovic SA, Tinti C, Benfenati SP. Long-term evaluation of osseointegrated implants inserted at the time or after vertical ridge augmentation. A retrospective study on 123 implants with 1–5 year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:35–45.
Benic GI, Bernasconi M, Jung RE, Hammerle CH. Clinical and radiographic intra-subject comparison of implants placed with or without guided bone regeneration: 15-year results. J Clin Periodontol. 2016. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12665.
Wang HL, Boyapati L. “PASS” principles for predictable bone regeneration. Implant Dent. 2006;15:8–17.
Al Salamah L, Babay N, Anil S, Al Rasheed A, Bukhary M. Guided bone regeneration using resorbable and non-resorbable membranes: a histological study in dogs. Odontostomatol Trop. 2012;35:43–50.
Simion M, Trisi P, Maglione M, Piattelli A. A preliminary report on a method for studying the permeability of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane to bacteria in vitro: a scanning electron microscopic and histological study. J Periodontol. 1994;65:755–61.
Park SH, Wang HL. Clinical significance of incision location on guided bone regeneration: human study. J Periodontol. 2007;78:47–51.
Moses O, Pitaru S, Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE. Healing of dehiscence-type defects in implants placed together with different barrier membranes: a comparative clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:210–9.
Deeb GR, Wilson GH, Carrico CK, Zafar U, Laskin DM, Deeb JG. Is the tunnel technique more effective than open augmentation with a titanium-reinforced polytetrafluoroethylene membrane for horizontal ridge augmentation? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74:1752–6.
Magnusson I, Batich C, Collins BR. New attachment formation following controlled tissue regeneration using biodegradable membranes. J Periodontol. 1988;59:1–6.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- Background : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [1]
- Background : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [2]
- Methods : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [1]
- Methods : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [2]
- Results : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- Discussion : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [1]
- Discussion : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [2]
- Conclusions : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- References : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [1]
- References : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [2]
- References : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [3]
- References : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [4]
- Acknowledgements : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- Author information : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- Rights and permissions : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- About this article : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- Table 1 Patient population and demographics and sites : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- Table 2 Baseline and re-entry measurement of the alveolar ridge width : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- Table 3 Alveolar ridge width reduction : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- Fig. 1. Clinical photographs of the both treatment groups after the initial surgery, 1 week post-op and at the re-entry. a) In the test group, no primary wound closure was achieved (left) and the barrier was left exposed for secondary intention healing. After 1 week, the matrix remained exposed (middle) showing no signs of infection. For months later, the exposed area was covered by a keratinized tissue (right). b) In the test group, primary wound closure was achieved at surgery (left). However, the barrier became exposed after 1 week of healing (middle). For months later, exposed area was covered with a keratinized tissue (right). c) In the control group, primary wound closure was achieved (left). After 1 week (middle), primary healing happened without any signs of membrane exposure. For months later, the site healed uneventfully (right) : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge a