References : Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars [1]
Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindström J, Hallén O, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand j plast reconstr surg suppl. 1977;16:1–132.
Parmigiani-Izquierdo JM. TécnicaAtraumática en Implantología. Rev esp odontoestomatológica implant. 11:30–5.
Parmigiani-Izquierdo JM, Sánchez-Pérez A, Cabaña-Muñoz ME. A pilot study of postoperative pain felt after two implant surgery techniques: a randomized blinded prospective clinical study. Int j oral maxillofac implants. 2013;28:1305–10.
Sedarat C, Harmand MF, Naji A, Nowzari H. In vitro kinetic evaluation of titanium alloy biodegradation. J periodontal res. 2001;36:269–74.
Chaturvedi TP. An overview of the corrosion aspect of dental implants (titanium and its alloys). Indian j dent res off publ indian soc dent res. 2009;20:91–8.
Wenz HJ, Bartsch J, Wolfart S, Kern M. Osseointegration and clinical success of zirconia dental implants: a systematic review. Int j prosthodont. 2008;21:27–36.
Andreiotelli M, Wenz HJ, Kohal R-J. Are ceramic implants a viable alternative to titanium implants? A systematic literature review. Clin oral implants res. 2009;20 Suppl 4:32–47.
Stadlinger B, Hennig M, Eckelt U, Kuhlisch E, Mai R. Comparison of zirconia and titanium implants after a short healing period. A pilot study in minipigs. Int j oral maxillofac surg. 2010;39:585–92.
Gahlert M, Burtscher D, Pfundstein G, Grunert I, Kniha H, Roehling S. Dental zirconia implants up to 3 years in function: a retrospective clinical study and evaluation of prosthetic restorations and failures. Int j oral maxillofac implants. 2013;28:896–904.
Gahlert M, Kniha H, Weingart D, Schild S, Gellrich N-C, Bormann K-H. A prospective clinical study to evaluate the performance of zirconium dioxide dental implants in single-tooth gaps. Clin oral implants res. 1 de abril de 2015;
Gahlert M, Roehling S, Sprecher CM, Kniha H, Milz S, Bormann K. In vivo performance of zirconia and titanium implants: a histomorphometric study in mini pig maxillae. Clin oral implants res. 2012;23:281–6.
Serial posts:
- Background : Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars
- Case presentation : Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars [1]
- Case presentation : Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars [2]
- Case presentation : Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars [3]
- Case presentation : Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars [4]
- Conclusions : Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars
- References : Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars [1]
- References : Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars [2]
- References : Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars [3]
- Author information : Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars
- Rights and permissions : Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars
- About this article : Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars
- Fig. 1. Diagnostic radiographic exploration previous to treatment : Zirconia implant
- Fig. 2. Flapless surgical technique, atraumatic surgical procedure for zirconium implants using the circular scalpel (a)–sharp, clean cut without bleeding (b) : Zirconia implant
- Fig. 3. Final restaurations: The parallelism of the implants is achieved by carving the non-submerged part a occlusal view and b lingual view : Zirconia implant
- Fig. 4. Follow-up after 1 year, no radiographic sign was appreciating and the osseointegration was satisfactory : Zirconia implant
- Fig. 5. Periapical X ray after 1 year of follow-up, the bone was stable and no sign of peri-implantitis was shown : Zirconia implant