References : Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars [2]
Bormann K-H, Gellrich N-C, Kniha H, Dard M, Wieland M, Gahlert M. Biomechanical evaluation of a microstructured zirconia implant by a removal torque comparison with a standard Ti-SLA implant. Clin oral implants res. 2012;23:1210–6.
Oliva J, Oliva X, Oliva JD. One-year follow-up of first consecutive 100 zirconia dental implants in humans: a comparison of 2 different rough surfaces. Int j oral maxillofac implants. 2007;22:430–5.
Siewert B, Parra M. Eine neue Werkstoffklasse in der Zahnmedizin: PEEK als Gerüstmaterial bei 12-gliedrigen implantatgetragenen Brücken. Z zahnärztl implant. 29:148–59.
Callís EM. Fundamentos de la estética bucal en el grupo anterior. Quintessence; 2001. 401 p.
Steger E. Sistema CAD/CAM Zirkonzahn. Quintessenza odontotec. 2013;10:70–82.
Berglundh T, Persson L, Klinge B. A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. J clin periodontol. 2002;29 Suppl 3:197-212-233.
Duyck J, Vandamme K. The effect of loading on peri-implant bone: a critical review of the literature. J oral rehabil. 2014;41(10):783–94.
Frost HM. Perspectives: bone’s mechanical usage windows. Bone miner. 1992;19:257–71.
Huiskes R, Weinans H, van Rietbergen B. The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clin orthop. 1992;274:124–34.
Ponnappan RK, Serhan H, Zarda B, Patel R, Albert T, Vaccaro AR. Biomechanical evaluation and comparison of polyetheretherketone rod system to traditional titanium rod fixation. Spine j off j north am spine soc. 2009;9:263–7.
Schwitalla AD, Spintig T, Kallage I, Müller W-D. Flexural behavior of PEEK materials for dental application. Dent mater off publ acad dent mater. 2015;31:1377–84.
Schwitalla AD, Abou-Emara M, Spintig T, Lackmann J, Müller WD. Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of PEEK dental implants on the peri-implant bone. J biomech. 2015;48:1–7.
Rosentritt M, Preis V, Behr M, Sereno N, Kolbeck C. Shear bond strength between veneering composite and PEEK after different surface modifications. Clin oral investig. 2015;19:739–44.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars
- Background : Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars
- Case presentation : Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars [1]
- Case presentation : Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars [2]
- Case presentation : Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars [3]
- Case presentation : Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars [4]
- Conclusions : Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars
- References : Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars [1]
- References : Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars [2]
- References : Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars [3]
- Author information : Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars
- Rights and permissions : Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars
- About this article : Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars