Open hour: senin - sabtu 09:00:00 - 20:00:00; minggu & tanggal merah tutup
Results : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants in the edentulous posterior mandible [2]

Results : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants in the edentulous posterior mandible [2]

author: Yuta Shimura, Yuji Sato, Noboru Kitagawa, Miyuki Omori | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID

Figure 11 and Table 4 show the strain, by loading site, in the implant part corresponding to the first molar in the experimental models during the application of a 100-N vertical load.

Considerable compressive strain was observed with the load-side strain gauges in all placements, and similar trends were observed between placements. As much as about 4500 με of compressive strain was observed. Strain B was significantly higher for the B-offset than for any of the other placements during buccal loading (Table 5). Strain L did not show a significant difference between placements during lingual loading (Table 6).

Figure 12 and Table 7 show the strain, by loading site, in the implant part corresponding to the first molar in the FEA models during the application of a 100-N vertical load.

Similar to the experimental models, considerable compressive strain was observed on the load side in all placements, and similar trends were noted between placements. As much as about 1700 με of compressive strain was observed. Strain B was significantly greater with straight placement than with offset placement during buccal loading (Table 8). Stain L with lingual loading was significantly higher in the L-offset than in the B-offset (Table 9). There were differences between the experimental and FEA models in the magnitude of strain around the peri-implant bone. However, the trends for the occurrence of strain based on differences in loading site were similar between the two groups.

Figures 13 and 14 show the stress distributions in the peri-implant bone in the FEA models during the application of a 100-N vertical load. In all placements, considerable stress was concentrated in the load-side peri-implant bone. Stress was found to be concentrated over a broad range in the cancellous bone surrounding the implant body bottom in the B-offset during buccal loading and in the L-offset during lingual loading.

Serial posts:


id post:
New thoughts
Me:
search
glossary
en in