Results : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
All 15 consecutive patients eligible to join the study on the basis of the inclusion and exclusion criteria agreed to participate in this study. The patient characteristics are depicted in Table 1. All implant-supported restorations had natural antagonistic teeth. Four of the 15 patients treated had a mobile implant, which had to be removed (in two patients 3 months after crown placement and in two patients 6 months after crown placement). Of the four failing implants, two were placed in the mandible and two in the maxilla, three were positioned in between two natural teeth and one free-ending, and two of the original teeth in the site of implant loss were lost because of crown fracture and two because of root fracture. The remaining 11 patients completed the 1-year evaluation. Implant and restoration survival were 73.3% at the 1-year evaluation. All the failed implant patients were successfully treated again after a healing period of 3 months (delayed placement).
The mean scores of the indices for plaque, calculus, gingiva, and bleeding were very low, hence favourable (Table 2). There was no plaque and calculus at any of the restoration surfaces and no infection present as expressed with the gingival index. Some minor bleeding on probing was present in only one patient. The mean probing depth was 1.9 mm (SD 0.8 mm) at the 1-year follow-up. The mean marginal bone level at the 1-month evaluation session (T1) was 0.94 ± 0.54 mm apically of the neck of the implant (Table 3). The mean loss of marginal bone between 1 month after restoration placement (T1) and 1-year post-loading (T12) was 0.17 ± 0.73 mm (Table 4). One patient’s restoration became loose, which could be solved by retightening the screw. No other complications occurred during the 1-year evaluation period. The questionnaire revealed that only one patient evaded eating with the implant-supported restoration and that all patients were satisfied with colour and form of crown and surrounding mucosa. The patients mean overall satisfaction was 9.0 ± 0.6 from a scale of 1 to 10 at the 1-year evaluation (Table 5). Success rate, as calculated from the criteria of success as proposed by Albrektsson et al. [18], was 73.3%.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- Background : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- Materials and methods : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study [1]
- Materials and methods : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study [2]
- Materials and methods : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study [3]
- Results : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- Discussion : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study [1]
- Discussion : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study [2]
- Discussion : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study [3]
- Conclusion : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- Availability of data and materials : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- References : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study [1]
- References : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study [2]
- References : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study [3]
- Acknowledgements : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- Funding : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- Author information : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- Ethics declarations : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- Additional information : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- Rights and permissions : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- About this article : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study group : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- Table 2 Frequencies and percentages of plaque index scores (possible score 0–3), calculus index scores (possible score 0–1), gingival index scores (possible score 0–3), bleeding index scores
- Table 3 Mean value, standard deviation, and frequency distribution (percentages) of marginal bone level at 1 month after restoration placement (T1) : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction
- Table 4 Mean value, standard deviation, and frequency distribution (percentages) of marginal bone change between 1 month after restoration placement (T1) and 1 year in function (T12) : Immediate
- Table 5 Patient’s satisfaction 12 months (T12) after restoration placement : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- Fig. 1. Pre-operative panoramic radiograph of a failing molar in position 36 : Immediate implant
- Fig. 2. Intraoral radiograph of an immediately placed post-extractive dental implant with a full contour zirconia restoration after 1 year (same patient as in Fig. 1) : Immediate implant