Table 5 Patient’s satisfaction 12 months (T12) after restoration placement : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
Table 5 Patient’s satisfaction 12 months (T12) after restoration placement : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
author: Henny J A Meijer, Gerry M Raghoebar | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
| Agreement percentage (n = 11) | |
|---|---|
| Presence of shame | 0.0 |
| Self-confidence has decreased | 0.0 |
| Evades eating with the implant | 9.1 |
| The ability to chew has decreased | 0.0 |
| Implant influences speech | 0.0 |
| Implant influences taste | 0.0 |
| Not satisfied with the colour of the crown | 0.0 |
| Not satisfied with the form of the crown | 0.0 |
| Not satisfied with the colour of the mucosa around the crown | 0.0 |
| Not satisfied with the form of the mucosa around the crown | 0.0 |
| Overall satisfaction (possible score 0–10) | 9.0 ± 0.6 |
Table 5 Patient’s satisfaction 12 months (T12) after restoration placement
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- Background : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- Materials and methods : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study [1]
- Materials and methods : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study [2]
- Materials and methods : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study [3]
- Results : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- Discussion : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study [1]
- Discussion : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study [2]
- Discussion : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study [3]
- Conclusion : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- Availability of data and materials : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- References : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study [1]
- References : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study [2]
- References : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study [3]
- Acknowledgements : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- Funding : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- Author information : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- Ethics declarations : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- Additional information : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- Rights and permissions : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- About this article : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study group : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- Table 2 Frequencies and percentages of plaque index scores (possible score 0–3), calculus index scores (possible score 0–1), gingival index scores (possible score 0–3), bleeding index scores
- Table 3 Mean value, standard deviation, and frequency distribution (percentages) of marginal bone level at 1 month after restoration placement (T1) : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction
- Table 4 Mean value, standard deviation, and frequency distribution (percentages) of marginal bone change between 1 month after restoration placement (T1) and 1 year in function (T12) : Immediate
- Table 5 Patient’s satisfaction 12 months (T12) after restoration placement : Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 1-year prospective case series pilot study
- Fig. 1. Pre-operative panoramic radiograph of a failing molar in position 36 : Immediate implant
- Fig. 2. Intraoral radiograph of an immediately placed post-extractive dental implant with a full contour zirconia restoration after 1 year (same patient as in Fig. 1) : Immediate implant