Table 1 Descriptive statistics of membrane thickness and perforation rate : Crestal endoscopic approach for evaluating sinus membrane elevation technique
Table 1 Descriptive statistics of membrane thickness and perforation rate : Crestal endoscopic approach for evaluating sinus membrane elevation technique
author: Samy Elian, Khaled Barakat | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
| Group | Membrane thickness | Mean ± SD (mm) | Median (range) | Percentage (%) (from total) | Perforation rate (%) (from total) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A (n = 4) | < 2 mm | 1.30 ± 0.53 | 1.25 (0.8–1.9) | 33.33 | 16.67 |
| B (n = 8) | > 2 mm | 5.87 ± 2.70 | 5.50 (2.2–10.4) | 66.66 | 0 |
Table 1 Descriptive statistics of membrane thickness and perforation rate
Serial posts:
- Introduction : Crestal endoscopic approach for evaluating sinus membrane elevation technique
- Patients and methods : Crestal endoscopic approach for evaluating sinus membrane elevation technique [1]
- Patients and methods : Crestal endoscopic approach for evaluating sinus membrane elevation technique [2]
- Results : Crestal endoscopic approach for evaluating sinus membrane elevation technique [1]
- Results : Crestal endoscopic approach for evaluating sinus membrane elevation technique [2]
- Discussion : Crestal endoscopic approach for evaluating sinus membrane elevation technique
- References : Crestal endoscopic approach for evaluating sinus membrane elevation technique [1]
- References : Crestal endoscopic approach for evaluating sinus membrane elevation technique [2]
- Acknowledgements : Crestal endoscopic approach for evaluating sinus membrane elevation technique
- Author information : Crestal endoscopic approach for evaluating sinus membrane elevation technique
- Ethics declarations : Crestal endoscopic approach for evaluating sinus membrane elevation technique
- Rights and permissions : Crestal endoscopic approach for evaluating sinus membrane elevation technique
- About this article : Crestal endoscopic approach for evaluating sinus membrane elevation technique
- Table 1 Descriptive statistics of membrane thickness and perforation rate : Crestal endoscopic approach for evaluating sinus membrane elevation technique
- Table 2 Chi square test showing perforation rate among different groups : Crestal endoscopic approach for evaluating sinus membrane elevation technique
- Table 3 Descriptive statistics, results of Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests for comparison between membrane thicknesses of different morphologies : Crestal endoscopic approach for evaluating sinus membrane elevation technique
- Table 4 Chi square test showing perforation rate by different morphologies : Crestal endoscopic approach for evaluating sinus membrane elevation technique
- Fig. 1. A trephined hole (4 mm bone) in the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus to allow entrance of the endoscope : Crestal endoscopic approach for evaluating sinus m
- Fig. 2. Malleting instruments supplied from InnoBioSurg (IBS) Company, Korea. a magic sinus splitter: used to widen and split the crest. b magic sinus lifter: used to lift the available bone with its attached membrane : Crestal endoscopic approach for evaluating sinus m
- Fig. 3. Endoscopic view from the lateral sinus wall showing the dome-shape elevation of sinus lining : Crestal endoscopic approach for evaluating sinus m
- Fig. 4. Schematic drawing showing entrance of the endoscope from the crestal osteotomy site after sinus membrane elevation to assess the integrity of the membrane : Crestal endoscopic approach for evaluating sinus m
- Fig. 5. Endoscopic view from the crestal osteotomy site showing perforation of the sinus lining under the power of magnification and illumination of the endoscope : Crestal endoscopic approach for evaluating sinus m
- Fig. 6. Box plot representing mean values of membrane thicknesses for the investigated groups : Crestal endoscopic approach for evaluating sinus m
- Fig. 7. Box and Whisker plot representing median and range values of membrane thicknesses with different morphologies : Crestal endoscopic approach for evaluating sinus m