Table 1 Statistical analysis of individual parameters
Table 1 Statistical analysis of individual parameters
author: P P T Arajo, S A Sousa, V B S Diniz, P P Gomes, J S P da Silva, A R Germano | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Zygomatic implant group
Conventional implant group
Variable
N
Mean
PD
IC 95 %
N
Mean
PD
IC 95 %
p
Overall satisfaction
14
8.88
0.71
−1.17/−0.38
14
9.65
0.13
−1.19/−0.36
0.001
Stability
14
9.79
0.54
−0.50/0.09
14
10.00
0.00
−0.52/0.11
0.009
Ease of cleaning
14
5.82
1.99
−3.49/−1.14
14
8.15
0.78
−3.52/−1.11
0.045
Ability to speak
14
8.78
1.73
−2.16/−0.26
14
10.00
0.00
−2.21/−0.21
0.00
Aesthetics
14
9.64
0.90
−0.73/0.32
14
9.85
0.32
−0.75/0.33
0.05
Self-esteem
14
9.66
0.85
−0.80/0.13
14
10.00
0.00
−0.82/0.15
0.002
Masticatory function
14
9.52
1.08
−1.03/0.16
14
9,95
0,16
−1.06/0.19
0.003
Serial posts:
-
Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants using sinus slot technique
-
Background : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants
-
Methods : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (1)
-
Methods : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (2)
-
Methods : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (3)
-
Methods : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (4)
-
Methods : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (5)
-
Results : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (1)
-
Results : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (2)
-
Discussion : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (1)
-
Discussion : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (2)
-
Discussion : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (3)
-
Discussion : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (4)
-
Discussion : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (5)
-
Discussion : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (6)
-
Discussion : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (7)
-
Discussion : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (8)
-
Reference : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (8)
-
Figure 1. a Brånemark technique. b Sinus slot technique. c Extrasinus technique
-
Figure 2. Periapical radiographs using the parallelism technique
-
Figure 3. Panoramic radiograph showing bone level maintenance around the conventional implants
-
Figure 4. Coronal slice from the CBCT showing implant apical third inside the zygomatic bone
-
Figure 5. Coronal slice from the CBCT showing small exteriorization of a zygomatic implant apex
-
Figure 6. Zygomatic implant probing using a WHO periodontal probe
-
Figure 7. Visual analog scale—patient version
-
Figure 8. Visual analog scale—evaluator version
-
Table 1 Statistical analysis of individual parameters
| Zygomatic implant group | Conventional implant group | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | N | Mean | PD | IC 95 % | N | Mean | PD | IC 95 % | p |
| Overall satisfaction | 14 | 8.88 | 0.71 | −1.17/−0.38 | 14 | 9.65 | 0.13 | −1.19/−0.36 | 0.001 |
| Stability | 14 | 9.79 | 0.54 | −0.50/0.09 | 14 | 10.00 | 0.00 | −0.52/0.11 | 0.009 |
| Ease of cleaning | 14 | 5.82 | 1.99 | −3.49/−1.14 | 14 | 8.15 | 0.78 | −3.52/−1.11 | 0.045 |
| Ability to speak | 14 | 8.78 | 1.73 | −2.16/−0.26 | 14 | 10.00 | 0.00 | −2.21/−0.21 | 0.00 |
| Aesthetics | 14 | 9.64 | 0.90 | −0.73/0.32 | 14 | 9.85 | 0.32 | −0.75/0.33 | 0.05 |
| Self-esteem | 14 | 9.66 | 0.85 | −0.80/0.13 | 14 | 10.00 | 0.00 | −0.82/0.15 | 0.002 |
| Masticatory function | 14 | 9.52 | 1.08 | −1.03/0.16 | 14 | 9,95 | 0,16 | −1.06/0.19 | 0.003 |
- Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants using sinus slot technique
- Background : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants
- Methods : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (1)
- Methods : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (2)
- Methods : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (3)
- Methods : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (4)
- Methods : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (5)
- Results : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (1)
- Results : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (2)
- Discussion : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (1)
- Discussion : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (2)
- Discussion : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (3)
- Discussion : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (4)
- Discussion : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (5)
- Discussion : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (6)
- Discussion : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (7)
- Discussion : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (8)
- Reference : Evaluation of patients undergoing placement of zygomatic implants (8)
- Figure 1. a Brånemark technique. b Sinus slot technique. c Extrasinus technique
- Figure 2. Periapical radiographs using the parallelism technique
- Figure 3. Panoramic radiograph showing bone level maintenance around the conventional implants
- Figure 4. Coronal slice from the CBCT showing implant apical third inside the zygomatic bone
- Figure 5. Coronal slice from the CBCT showing small exteriorization of a zygomatic implant apex
- Figure 6. Zygomatic implant probing using a WHO periodontal probe
- Figure 7. Visual analog scale—patient version
- Figure 8. Visual analog scale—evaluator version
- Table 1 Statistical analysis of individual parameters