Table 4 Prosthetic complications
Table 4 Prosthetic complications
author: Yoshiyuki Hagiwara,Tatsuya Narita,Yohei Shioda,Keisuke Iwasaki,Takayuki Ikeda,Shunsuke Namaki, Thomas J Salinas | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
| Question | Values | |
|---|---|---|
| Q9. What are the main issues generally encountered? | Compatibility precision issues | 29.6% |
| Aesthetic issues | 33.2% | |
| Occlusal issues | 37.2% | |
| Q10. What are the main fabrication challenges faced? | Poor implant location and orientation | 42.4% |
| Inadequate consideration of occlusion | 17.0% | |
| Defects and inaccuracies in impression and bite registration | 29.0% | |
| Defective or unreasonable prosthesis design | 10.6% | |
| Other | 1.0% | |
| Q11. What are the frequently received repair requests involving implant fixed prostheses? | Facing damage and chipping | 54.5% |
| Facing discoloration and wear (indirect composite veneer crowns) | 17.0% | |
| Bridge connector fracture | 10.0% | |
| Design changes and modification associated with additional implants | 13.9% | |
| Other | 4.6% | |
| Q12. What kind of creative steps do you take in order to prevent veneer fracture and chipping in the molar region? | Use of metal occlusal designs | 15.1% |
| Use of indirect composite resin material | 15.7% | |
| Devise metal coping designs | 36.3% | |
| Cover the distal-most part with metal | 24.0% | |
| Nothing in particular | 8.9% | |
| Q13. What are the frequently received repair requests for IODs? | Fracturing of the denture base or denture tooth detachment/fracture | 53.8% |
| Mesostructure (attachment) damage | 8.4% | |
| Occlusal reconstruction due to denture wear or attrition | 24.1% | |
| Replacement of the attachment system (transition to another system) | 8.1% | |
| Other | 5.6% | |
| Q14. Do you have any requests for dentists who practice implant treatment? | To consult technicians or allow technicians to participate from the treatment planning stage | 28.3% |
| To use suitable implant location and orientation | 31.8% | |
| To improve treatment and condition of soft tissue | 21.8% | |
| To study more about prostheses and occlusion | 14.5% | |
| Other | 3.6% |
Serial posts:
- Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan
- Background : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan (1)
- Background : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan (2)
- Methods : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan
- Table 1 Conditions characterizing implant laboratories
- Table 2 Implant fixed prostheses
- Table 3 Implant overdentures (IODs)
- Table 4 Prosthetic complications
- Result & discussion: Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan (1)
- Result & discussion: Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan (2)
- Result & discussion: Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan (3)
- Result & discussion: Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan (4)
- Result & discussion: Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan (5)
- Result & discussion: Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan (6)
- Result & discussion: Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan (7)
- Result & discussion: Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan (8)
- Result & discussion: Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan (9)
- Conclusions: Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan
- Figure 1. The proportions of abutments used with cement-retained prostheses
- Figure 2. Types of materials used to make implant prostheses in the anterior region
- Figure 3. Types of implant fixed prostheses are used in the posterior region
- Figure 4. The proportions of attachment types used with IODs
- Figure 5. The main fabrication challenges faced
- Figure 6. the frequently received repair requests involving implant fixed prostheses
- Figure 7. Creative steps to prevent veneer fracture and chipping in the molar region
- Figure 8. What are the frequently received repair requests for IODs?
- Figure 9. Do you have any requests for dentists who practice implant treatment?