Open hour: senin - sabtu 09:00:00 - 20:00:00; minggu & tanggal merah tutup
Conclusions : Accuracy of static computer-assisted implant placement in anterior and posterior sites by clinicians new to implant dentistry: in vitro comparison of fully guided, pilot-guided, and freehand protocols

Conclusions : Accuracy of static computer-assisted implant placement in anterior and posterior sites by clinicians new to implant dentistry: in vitro comparison of fully guided, pilot-guided, and freehand protocols

author: Jaafar Abduo, Douglas Lau | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID

Within the limitations of the present study, it can be hypothesized that apart from vertical deviation, the FG protocol is more accurate than the PG and FH protocols for all the evaluated variables in the hands of inexperienced clinicians. The PG and FH protocols were generally similar. The FG protocol did not seem to be influenced by the position of the placed implants, while the PG and FH protocols showed inferior outcomes for the posterior implants in comparison to the anterior implants. The FG protocol of this study indicated that implant position errors were 1 mm horizontally, 0.5 mm vertically, and 2.5° angulation error. This fit within most recommendations that a 2-mm safety zone has to be considered for the FG protocol.

Serial posts:


id post:
New thoughts
Me:
search
glossary
en in