Open hour: senin - sabtu 09:00:00 - 20:00:00; minggu & tanggal merah tutup
References : Comparative evaluation among laser-treated, machined, and sandblasted/acid-etched implant surfaces: an in vivo histologic analysis on sheep [1]

References : Comparative evaluation among laser-treated, machined, and sandblasted/acid-etched implant surfaces: an in vivo histologic analysis on sheep [1]

author: I De Tullio, M Berardini, D Di Iorio, F Perfetti, G Perfetti | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID

Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindström J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52(2):155–70.

Puleo DA, Nanci A. Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface. Biomaterials. 1999;20(23-24):2311–21.

Huang MS, Chen LK, Ou KL, et al. Rapid osseointegration of titanium implant with innovative nanoporous surface modification: animal model and clinical trial. Implant Dent. 2015;24:441–7.

Chiang HJ, Hsu HJ, Peng PW, et al. Early bone response to machined, sandblasting acid etching (SLA) and novel surface-functionalization (SLAffinity) titanium implants: characterization, biomechanical analysis and histological evaluation in pigs. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2016;104:397–405.

Cooper LF. A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84(5):522–34.

Kohles SS, Clark MB, Brown CA, Kenealy JN. Direct assessment of profilometric roughness variability from typical implant surface types. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:510–6.

Perrotti V, Palmieri A, Pellati A, Degidi M, Ricci L, Piattelli A, Carinci F. Effect of titanium surface topographies on human bone marrow stem cells differentiation in vitro. Odontology. 2013;101(2):133–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-012-0067-0 Epub 2012 Jun 8.

Anselme K, Ponche A, Bigerelle M. Relative influence of surface topography and surface chemistry on cell response to bone implant materials. Part 2: biological aspects. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2010;224(12):1487–507.

Perrotti V, Aprile G, Degidi M, Piattelli A, Iezzi G. Fractal analysis: a novel method to assess roughness organization of implant surface topography. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011;31(6):633–9.

Berardi D, Colagiovanni M, Scoccia A, et al. Evaluation of a new laser surface implant: scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive X-ray and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analyses. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2008;22:161–7.

Tan J, Saltzman WM. Biomaterials with hierarchically defined micro- and nanoscale structure. Biomaterials. 2004;25:3593–601.

Smith DC, Pilliar RM, Chernecky R. Dental implant materials. I. Some effects of preparative procedures on surface topography. J Biomed Mater Res. 1991;25:1045–68.

Serial posts:


id post:
New thoughts
Me:
search
glossary
en in