References : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [2]
Zitzmann NU, Scharer P. Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla. Comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998;85(1):8–17.
Esposito M, Felice P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2014(5):CD008397.
Schwartz-Arad D, Herzberg R, Dolev E. The prevalence of surgical complications of the sinus graft procedure and their impact on implant survival. J Periodontol. 2004;75(4):511–6.
Emmerich D, Att W, Stappert C. Sinus floor elevation using osteotomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2005;76(8):1237–51.
Engelke W, Deckwer I. Endoscopically controlled sinus floor augmentation. A preliminary report. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8(6):527–31.
Sendyk W, Sendyk C. Reconstrução óssea por meio do levantamento do assoalho do seio maxilar. São Paulo: Santos. 2002:109–22.
Summers RB. The osteotome technique: part 3—less invasive methods of elevating the sinus floor. Compendium. 1994;15(6):698, 700, 2–4 passim; quiz 10.
Pommer B, Watzek G. Gel-pressure technique for flapless transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation: a preliminary cadaveric study of a new surgical technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24(5):817–22.
Sotirakis EG, Gonshor A. Elevation of the maxillary sinus floor with hydraulic pressure. The Journal of oral implantology. 2005;31(4):197–204.
Jesch P, Bruckmoser E, Bayerle A, Eder K, Bayerle-Eder M, Watzinger F. A pilot-study of a minimally invasive technique to elevate the sinus floor membrane and place graft for augmentation using high hydraulic pressure: 18-month follow-up of 20 cases. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology. 2013;116(3):293–300.
Bae OY, Kim YS, Shin SY, Kim WK, Lee YK, Kim SH. Clinical outcomes of reamer- vs osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implant placement: a 2-year retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015;30(4):925–30.
Ahn SH, Park EJ, Kim ES. Reamer-mediated transalveolar sinus floor elevation without osteotome and simultaneous implant placement in the maxillary molar area: clinical outcomes of 391 implants in 380 patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(7):866–72.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
- Background : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [1]
- Background : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [2]
- Methods : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [1]
- Methods : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [2]
- Results : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
- Discussion : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [2]
- Discussion : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [3]
- Change history : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
- References : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [1]
- References : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [2]
- References : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [3]
- Author information : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
- Ethics declarations : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
- Rights and permissions : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
- Table 1 The association between the methods used the following variables: occurrence of perforation, length of perforation, and the time of operation : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
- Table 2 The results of logistic regression of method used on the occurrence of perforation : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
- Fig. 1. Determination of the remaining bone height (RBH) on the CBCT image : Comparison of three different methods of internal
- Fig. 2. The exposed mesial aspect of the sinus : Comparison of three different methods of internal
- Fig. 3. a The balloon in a resting position. b The inflated balloon [12] : Comparison of three different methods of internal
- Fig. 4. The inflated balloon while elevating the sinus membrane (The balloon is seen from the medial.) : Comparison of three different methods of internal
- Fig. 5. a The CAS drill has four blades and an inverse conical shape. b The hydraulic lifter : Comparison of three different methods of internal
- Fig. 6. The hydraulic lifter stabilized in the osteotomy before injecting the saline : Comparison of three different methods of internal