Open hour: senin - sabtu 09:00:00 - 20:00:00; minggu & tanggal merah tutup

Fig. 6. The hydraulic lifter stabilized in the ost...

Fig. 6. The hydraulic lifter stabilized in the osteotomy before injecting the saline Fig. 6. The hydraulic lifter stabilized in the osteotomy before injecting the saline

Fig. 5. a The CAS drill has four blades and an inv...

Fig. 5. se conical shape. b The hydraulic lifter Fig. 5. a The CAS drill has four blades and an inverse conical shape. b The hydraulic lifter

Fig. 4. The inflated balloon while elevating the s...

Fig. 4. The inflated balloon while elevating the sinus membrane (The balloon is seen from the medial.) Fig. 4. The inflated balloon while elevating the sinus membrane (The balloon is seen from the medial.)

Fig. 3. a The balloon in a resting position. b The...

Fig. 3. Fig. 3. a The balloon in a resting position. b The inflated balloon [12]

Fig. 2. The exposed mesial aspect of the sinus : C...

Fig. 2. The exposed mesial aspect of the sinus Fig. 2. The exposed mesial aspect of the sinus

Fig. 1. Determination of the remaining bone height...

Fig. 1. Determination of the remaining bone height (RBH) on the CBCT image Fig. 1. Determination of the remaining bone height (RBH) on the CBCT image

Table 2 The results of logistic regression of meth...

Methods BAOFSE BALLOON CAS kit Number of cases 12 12 ...

Table 1 The association between the methods used t...

  BAOSFE BALLOON CAS kit Total Stats p value Occurrence of perforation ...

About this article : Comparison of three different...

Yassin Alsabbagh, A., Alsabbagh, M.M., Darjazini Nahas, B. et al. Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study. Int J Implant Dent 3, 40 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-017-0103-5 Download citation Received: 13 March 2017 Accepted: 29 August 2017 Published: 04 September 2017 DOI: https://doi.org/10...

Rights and permissions : Comparison of three diffe...

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were...

Ethics declarations : Comparison of three differen...

Aghiad Yassin Alsabbagh, Mohammed Monzer Alsabbagh, Batol Darjazini Nahas, and Salam Rajih declare that they have no competing interests. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information : Comparison of three different...

Department of Periodontology, Damascus University Dental School, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic Aghiad Yassin Alsabbagh & Mohammed Monzer Alsabbagh Department of Orthodontics, Damascus University Dental School, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic Batol Darjazini Nahas Temple university, Philadelphia, USA Salam Rajih You can also search for this author in PubMed Google ...

References : Comparison of three different methods...

Toffler M, Toscano N, Holtzclaw D. Osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation using only platelet-rich fibrin: an early report on 110 patients. Implant Dent. 2010;19(5):447–56. Download references

References : Comparison of three different methods...

Zitzmann NU, Scharer P. Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla. Comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998;85(1):8–17. Esposito M, Felice P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2014(5):CD008397. Sc...

References : Comparison of three different methods...

Seong WJ, Barczak M, Jung J, Basu S, Olin PS, Conrad HJ. Prevalence of sinus augmentation associated with maxillary posterior implants. The Journal of oral implantology. 2013;39(6):680–8. Cawood JI, Howell RA. A classification of the edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988;17(4):232–6. Tan WC, Lang NP, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elev...

Change history : Comparison of three different met...

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

Conclusions : Comparison of three different method...

Within the limitation of this study and that of an ex vivo study, we can accept our hypotheses that the balloon is better than the BAOSFE in elevating the membrane mucosa and the CAS kit is better than the BAOSFE in preparing the osteotomy and breaking the sinus floor for elevation heights of 7 mm. Further, in vivo studies need to be taken to prove these findings.

Discussion : Comparison of three different methods...

The BAOSFE technique caused perforations in the membrane in 7 out of 12 cases with a percentage of 58.4. This result is consistent with many previous studies which state that this technique has a high rate of perforations when the RBH is less than 5 mm [2, 7, 26]. Also, all the perforations happened during the elevation process; however, this percentage is different than that reported by Steltzle...

Discussion : Comparison of three different methods...

Using a reamer instead of the osteotomes for breaking the sinus floor has the advantage of creating a thin bone shell that prevents direct contact between the drill and the Schneiderian membrane [24]. Moreover, using a reamer has been shown to cause less discomfort and nausea when compared to the osteotome technique as a result of the constant tapping of the osteotomes [25]. As a result, the CAS k...

Discussion : Comparison of three different methods...

Although the lateral sinus floor elevation is a proven clinically successful technique [14], the indirect SFE approach is favorable among clinicians because it does not require a second surgery site and hence cause less trauma and discomfort for the patient [14,15,16]. However, this method has its drawbacks, such as a higher risk of membrane perforation, a decreased space for using surgical instru...

Results : Comparison of three different methods of...

For the entire sample, the mean perforation length was (0.711 mm, SD = 1.4) and the mean time required to perform the procedure was (5.65 min, SD = 2.26), and out of the entire sample (N = 36), perforations happened in nine cases for a percentage of 25%. Chi-square test showed a significant association between method used and the occurrence of perforation (chi-square statistic = 8.585, ...

Methods : Comparison of three different methods of...

This approach starts like BAOSFE. The osteotomy is enlarged to 5.0 mm before the balloon (Zimmer Sinus Lift Balloon, Zimmer Dental Inc., California, USA) is inserted (Fig. 3). The sinus floor was broken with the 5 mm osteotome after the addition of bone. The sleeve of the balloon was inserted 1 mm beyond the sinus floor. The saline was injected slowly from the syringe into the balloon, so the ...

Methods : Comparison of three different methods of...

To achieve our purposes, an experimental ex vivo study was carried. This research project was approved by the University of Damascus Local Research Ethics Committee (UDDS-3045PG.) and was funded by the Damascus University Postgraduate Research Budget (97687027834DEN). The sinus floor elevations were done on 18 bisected heads of lambs aged between 6 and 12 months that were slaughtered in a maximum...

Background : Comparison of three different methods...

Therefore, the two working hypotheses of our study were “the CAS-Kit is safer than BAOSFE in breaking the sinus floor and the balloon is safer than BAOSFE in elevating the Schneiderian membrane” for elevation heights of 7 mm.

Background : Comparison of three different methods...

More than half of the implants placed in the posterior maxilla require sinus floor elevation (SFE) [1]. The need for this procedure is explained by continuous ridge resorption in an apical direction after tooth extraction combined with progressive sinus pneumatization in addition to poor bone quality that is frequently seen in the maxilla [2]. Sinus membrane perforation is considered the most com...

Abstract : Comparison of three different methods o...

Various techniques are available for elevating the sinus membrane. The aim of this study is to evaluate three methods of indirect sinus floor elevation regarding elevation heights of 7 mm on the outcomes of membrane perforation, length of perforation, and time required to perform the procedure. Three different methods for indirect sinus lifting, bone added osteotome sinus floor elevation (BAOS...

Fig. 6. The hydraulic lifter stabilized in the ost...

Fig. 6. The hydraulic lifter stabilized in the osteotomy before injecting the saline Fig. 6. The hydraulic lifter stabilized in the osteotomy before injecting the saline

Fig. 5. a The CAS drill has four blades and an inv...

Fig. 5. Fig. 5. a The CAS drill has four blades and an inverse conical shape. b The hydraulic lifter

Fig. 4. The inflated balloon while elevating the s...

Fig. 4. The inflated balloon while elevating the sinus membrane (The balloon is seen from the medial.) Fig. 4. The inflated balloon while elevating the sinus membrane (The balloon is seen from the medial.)

Fig. 3. a The balloon in a resting position. b The...

Fig. 3. 12] Fig. 3. a The balloon in a resting position. b The inflated balloon [12]

Fig. 2. The exposed mesial aspect of the sinus : C...

Fig. 2. The exposed mesial aspect of the sinus Fig. 2. The exposed mesial aspect of the sinus

Fig. 1. Determination of the remaining bone height...

Fig. 1. Determination of the remaining bone height (RBH) on the CBCT image Fig. 1. Determination of the remaining bone height (RBH) on the CBCT image

Table 2 The results of logistic regression of meth...

Methods BAOFSE BALLOON CAS kit Number of cases 12 12 ...

Table 1 The association between the methods used t...

  BAOSFE BALLOON CAS kit Total Stats p value Occurrence of perforation ...

About this article : Comparison of three different...

Yassin Alsabbagh, A., Alsabbagh, M.M., Darjazini Nahas, B. et al. Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study. Int J Implant Dent 3, 40 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-017-0103-5 Download citation Received: 13 March 2017 Accepted: 29 August 2017 Published: 04 September 2017 DOI: https://doi.org/10...

Rights and permissions : Comparison of three diffe...

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were...

Ethics declarations : Comparison of three differen...

Aghiad Yassin Alsabbagh, Mohammed Monzer Alsabbagh, Batol Darjazini Nahas, and Salam Rajih declare that they have no competing interests. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information : Comparison of three different...

Department of Periodontology, Damascus University Dental School, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic Aghiad Yassin Alsabbagh & Mohammed Monzer Alsabbagh Department of Orthodontics, Damascus University Dental School, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic Batol Darjazini Nahas Temple university, Philadelphia, USA Salam Rajih You can also search for this author in PubMed Google ...

References : Comparison of three different methods...

Toffler M, Toscano N, Holtzclaw D. Osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation using only platelet-rich fibrin: an early report on 110 patients. Implant Dent. 2010;19(5):447–56. Download references

References : Comparison of three different methods...

Zitzmann NU, Scharer P. Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla. Comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998;85(1):8–17. Esposito M, Felice P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2014(5):CD008397. Sc...

References : Comparison of three different methods...

Seong WJ, Barczak M, Jung J, Basu S, Olin PS, Conrad HJ. Prevalence of sinus augmentation associated with maxillary posterior implants. The Journal of oral implantology. 2013;39(6):680–8. Cawood JI, Howell RA. A classification of the edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988;17(4):232–6. Tan WC, Lang NP, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elev...

Change history : Comparison of three different met...

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

Conclusions : Comparison of three different method...

Within the limitation of this study and that of an ex vivo study, we can accept our hypotheses that the balloon is better than the BAOSFE in elevating the membrane mucosa and the CAS kit is better than the BAOSFE in preparing the osteotomy and breaking the sinus floor for elevation heights of 7 mm. Further, in vivo studies need to be taken to prove these findings.

Discussion : Comparison of three different methods...

The BAOSFE technique caused perforations in the membrane in 7 out of 12 cases with a percentage of 58.4. This result is consistent with many previous studies which state that this technique has a high rate of perforations when the RBH is less than 5 mm [2, 7, 26]. Also, all the perforations happened during the elevation process; however, this percentage is different than that reported by Steltzle...

Discussion : Comparison of three different methods...

Using a reamer instead of the osteotomes for breaking the sinus floor has the advantage of creating a thin bone shell that prevents direct contact between the drill and the Schneiderian membrane [24]. Moreover, using a reamer has been shown to cause less discomfort and nausea when compared to the osteotome technique as a result of the constant tapping of the osteotomes [25]. As a result, the CAS k...

Discussion : Comparison of three different methods...

Although the lateral sinus floor elevation is a proven clinically successful technique [14], the indirect SFE approach is favorable among clinicians because it does not require a second surgery site and hence cause less trauma and discomfort for the patient [14,15,16]. However, this method has its drawbacks, such as a higher risk of membrane perforation, a decreased space for using surgical instru...

Results : Comparison of three different methods of...

For the entire sample, the mean perforation length was (0.711 mm, SD = 1.4) and the mean time required to perform the procedure was (5.65 min, SD = 2.26), and out of the entire sample (N = 36), perforations happened in nine cases for a percentage of 25%. Chi-square test showed a significant association between method used and the occurrence of perforation (chi-square statistic = 8.585, ...

Methods : Comparison of three different methods of...

This approach starts like BAOSFE. The osteotomy is enlarged to 5.0 mm before the balloon (Zimmer Sinus Lift Balloon, Zimmer Dental Inc., California, USA) is inserted (Fig. 3). The sinus floor was broken with the 5 mm osteotome after the addition of bone. The sleeve of the balloon was inserted 1 mm beyond the sinus floor. The saline was injected slowly from the syringe into the balloon, so the ...

Methods : Comparison of three different methods of...

To achieve our purposes, an experimental ex vivo study was carried. This research project was approved by the University of Damascus Local Research Ethics Committee (UDDS-3045PG.) and was funded by the Damascus University Postgraduate Research Budget (97687027834DEN). The sinus floor elevations were done on 18 bisected heads of lambs aged between 6 and 12 months that were slaughtered in a maximum...

Background : Comparison of three different methods...

Therefore, the two working hypotheses of our study were “the CAS-Kit is safer than BAOSFE in breaking the sinus floor and the balloon is safer than BAOSFE in elevating the Schneiderian membrane” for elevation heights of 7 mm.

Background : Comparison of three different methods...

More than half of the implants placed in the posterior maxilla require sinus floor elevation (SFE) [1]. The need for this procedure is explained by continuous ridge resorption in an apical direction after tooth extraction combined with progressive sinus pneumatization in addition to poor bone quality that is frequently seen in the maxilla [2]. Sinus membrane perforation is considered the most com...

Abstract : Comparison of three different methods o...

Various techniques are available for elevating the sinus membrane. The aim of this study is to evaluate three methods of indirect sinus floor elevation regarding elevation heights of 7 mm on the outcomes of membrane perforation, length of perforation, and time required to perform the procedure. Three different methods for indirect sinus lifting, bone added osteotome sinus floor elevation (BAOS...