Table 1 The association between the methods used the following variables: occurrence of perforation, length of perforation, and the time of operation : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
Table 1 The association between the methods used the following variables: occurrence of perforation, length of perforation, and the time of operation : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
author: Aghiad Yassin Alsabbagh, Mohammed Monzer Alsabbagh, Batol Darjazini Nahas, Salam Rajih | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
BAOSFE
BALLOON
CAS kit
Total
Stats
p value
Occurrence of perforation
7 (58.4%) N = 12
1 (8.3%) N = 12
1 (8.3%) N = 12
9 (25%) N = 36
× 2 = 8.585a
0.014
Length of perforation (mean)
3.42 mm
0.5 mm
0.5 mm
0.711 mm
F = 11.031
0.0001
Time of operation (mean)
3.073 min
5.393 min
8.486 min
5.651 min
F = 1221
0.0001
Table 1 The association between the methods used the following variables: occurrence of perforation, length of perforation, and the time of operation
Serial posts:
-
Abstract : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
-
Background : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [1]
-
Background : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [2]
-
Methods : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [1]
-
Methods : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [2]
-
Results : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
-
Discussion : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [2]
-
Discussion : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [3]
-
Change history : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
-
References : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [1]
-
References : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [2]
-
References : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [3]
-
Author information : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
-
Ethics declarations : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
-
Rights and permissions : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
-
Table 1 The association between the methods used the following variables: occurrence of perforation, length of perforation, and the time of operation : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
-
Table 2 The results of logistic regression of method used on the occurrence of perforation : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
-
Fig. 1. Determination of the remaining bone height (RBH) on the CBCT image : Comparison of three different methods of internal
-
Fig. 2. The exposed mesial aspect of the sinus : Comparison of three different methods of internal
-
Fig. 3. a The balloon in a resting position. b The inflated balloon [12] : Comparison of three different methods of internal
-
Fig. 4. The inflated balloon while elevating the sinus membrane (The balloon is seen from the medial.) : Comparison of three different methods of internal
-
Fig. 5. a The CAS drill has four blades and an inverse conical shape. b The hydraulic lifter : Comparison of three different methods of internal
-
Fig. 6. The hydraulic lifter stabilized in the osteotomy before injecting the saline : Comparison of three different methods of internal
| BAOSFE | BALLOON | CAS kit | Total | Stats | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Occurrence of perforation | 7 (58.4%) N = 12 | 1 (8.3%) N = 12 | 1 (8.3%) N = 12 | 9 (25%) N = 36 | × 2 = 8.585a | 0.014 |
| Length of perforation (mean) | 3.42 mm | 0.5 mm | 0.5 mm | 0.711 mm | F = 11.031 | 0.0001 |
| Time of operation (mean) | 3.073 min | 5.393 min | 8.486 min | 5.651 min | F = 1221 | 0.0001 |
Table 1 The association between the methods used the following variables: occurrence of perforation, length of perforation, and the time of operation
- Abstract : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
- Background : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [1]
- Background : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [2]
- Methods : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [1]
- Methods : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [2]
- Results : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
- Discussion : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [2]
- Discussion : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [3]
- Change history : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
- References : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [1]
- References : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [2]
- References : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study [3]
- Author information : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
- Ethics declarations : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
- Rights and permissions : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
- Table 1 The association between the methods used the following variables: occurrence of perforation, length of perforation, and the time of operation : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
- Table 2 The results of logistic regression of method used on the occurrence of perforation : Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
- Fig. 1. Determination of the remaining bone height (RBH) on the CBCT image : Comparison of three different methods of internal
- Fig. 2. The exposed mesial aspect of the sinus : Comparison of three different methods of internal
- Fig. 3. a The balloon in a resting position. b The inflated balloon [12] : Comparison of three different methods of internal
- Fig. 4. The inflated balloon while elevating the sinus membrane (The balloon is seen from the medial.) : Comparison of three different methods of internal
- Fig. 5. a The CAS drill has four blades and an inverse conical shape. b The hydraulic lifter : Comparison of three different methods of internal
- Fig. 6. The hydraulic lifter stabilized in the osteotomy before injecting the saline : Comparison of three different methods of internal