References : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians [3]
Andreiotelli M, Att W, Strub JR. Prosthodontic complications with implant overdentures: a systematic literature review. Int J Prosthodont. 2010;3:195–203.
Cehreli MC, Karasoy D, Kokat AM, Akca K, Eckert SE. Systematic review of prosthetic maintenance requirements for implant-supported overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:163–80.
Hatzikyriakos A, Petridis HP, Tsiggos N, Sakelariou S. Considerations for services from dental technicians in fabrication of fixed prostheses: a survey of commercial dental laboratories in Thessaloniki, Greece. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;96:362–6.
Afsharzand Z, Rashedi B, Petropoulos VC. Communication between the dental laboratory technician and dentist: Work authorization for fixed partial dentures. J Prosthodont. 2006;15:123–8.
Kawazoe T. Introduction of Japanese Society of Oral Implantology. Int J Oral Sci. 2009;1:13–5.
Boynton PM, Greenhalgh T. Selecting designing, and developing your questionnaire. Br Med J. 2004;328:1312–5.
Boynton PM. Administering, analyzing, and reporting your questionnaire. Br Med J. 2004;328:1372–5.
Bower EJ, Newton PD, Gibbons DE, Newton JT. A national survey of dental technicians: Career development, professional status and job satisfaction. Br Dent J. 2004;197:144–8.
Nissan J, Narobai D, Gross O, Ghelfan O, Chaushu G. Long-term outcome of cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported partial restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26:1102–7.
Salvi GE, Brägger U. Mechanical and technical risks in implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24(Suppl):69–85.
Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Garefis PD. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:719–28.
Conserva E, Menini M, Tealdo T, Bevilacqua M, Ravera G, Pera F, et al. The use of a masticatory robot to analyze the shock absorption capacity of different restorative materials for prosthetic implants: a preliminary report. Int J Prosthodont. 2009;22:53–5.
Sahin S, Cehreli MC, Yalçin E. The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported prostheses—a review. J Dent. 2002;30:271–82.
Augstin-Panadero R, Fons-Font A, Roman-Rodriguez JL, Granell-Ruiz M, Del Rio-Highsmith J, Sola-Ruiz MF. Zirconia versus metal: a preliminary comparative analysis of ceramic veneer behavior. Int J Prosthodont. 2012;25:294–300.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians
- Background : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians [1]
- Background : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians [2]
- Methods : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians
- Results and discussion : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians [1]
- Results and discussion : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians [2]
- Results and discussion : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians [3]
- Results and discussion : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians [4]
- Results and discussion : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians [5]
- Results and discussion : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians [6]
- Results and discussion : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians [7]
- Results and discussion : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians [8]
- Conclusions : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians
- References : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians [1]
- References : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians [2]
- References : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians [3]
- References : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians [4]
- Acknowledgements : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians
- Author information : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians
- Additional information : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians
- Rights and permissions : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians
- About this article : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians
- Table 1 Conditions characterizing implant laboratories : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians
- Table 2 Implant fixed prostheses : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians
- Table 3 Implant overdentures (IODs) : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians
- Table 4 Prosthetic complications : Current status of implant prosthetics in Japan: a survey among certified dental lab technicians
- Figure 1. Q4. What are the proportions of abutments used with cement-retained prostheses? : Current status of implant
- Figure 2. Q5. What types of materials (i.e. veneer, coping) are used to make implant prostheses in the anterior region? : Current status of implant
- Figure 3. Q6. What types of implant fixed prostheses are used in the posterior region? : Current status of implant
- Figure 4. Q8. What are the proportions of attachment types used with IODs? : Current status of implant
- Figure 5. Q10. What are the main fabrication challenges faced? : Current status of implant
- Figure 6. Q11. What are the frequently received repair requests involving implant fixed prostheses? : Current status of implant
- Figure 7. Q12. What kind of creative steps do you take in order to prevent veneer fracture and chipping in the molar region? : Current status of implant
- Figure 8. Q13. What are the frequently received repair requests for IODs? : Current status of implant
- Figure 9. Q14. Do you have any requests for dentists who practice implant treatment? : Current status of implant