References : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant-abutment connection at different cyclic loading: an in-vitro experimental study [1]
Pjetursson BE, Asgeirsson AG, Zwahlen M, Sailer I. Improvements in implant dentistry over the last decade: comparison of survival and complication rates in older and newer publications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(Suppl):308–24.
Jung RE, Pjetursson BE, Glauser R, Zembic A, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:119–30.
Chaar MS, Att W, Strub JR. Prosthetic outcome of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental restorations: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38:697–711.
Binon PP. Implants and components: entering the new millennium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:76–94.
Hoyer SA, Stanford CM, Buranadham S, Fridrich T, Wagner J, Gratton D. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant–abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85:599–607.
Mangano F, Macchi A, Caprioglio A, Sammons RL, Piattelli A, Mangano C. Survival and complication rates of fixed restorations supported by locking-taper implants: a prospective study with 1 to 10 years of follow-up. J Prosthodont. 2014;23:434–44.
Bozkaya D, Muftu S. Mechanics of the taper integrated screwed-in (TIS) abutments used in dental implants. J Biomech. 2005;38:87–97.
Sutter F, Weber HP, Sorensen J, Belser U. The new restorative concept of the ITI dental implant system: design and engineering. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1993;13:408–31.
Khongkhunthian P, Khongkhunthian S, Weerawatprachya W, Pongpat K, Aunmeungtong W. Comparative study of torque resistance and microgaps between a combined Octatorx-cone connection and an internal hexagon implant-abutment connection. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;113:420–4.
Norton MR. Assessment of cold welding properties of the internal conical interface of two commercially available implant systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81:159–66.
Burguete RL, Johns RB, King T, Patterson EA. Tightening characteristics for screwed joints in osseointegrated dental implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71:592–9.
Haack JE, Sakaguchi RL, Sun T, Coffey JP. Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995;10:529–36.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant-abutment connection at different cyclic loading: an in-vitro experimental study
- Background : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant-abutment connection at different cyclic loading: an in-vitro experimental study [1]
- Background : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant-abutment connection at different cyclic loading: an in-vitro experimental study [2]
- Background : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant-abutment connection at different cyclic loading: an in-vitro experimental study [3]
- Materials and methods : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant-abutment connection at different cyclic loading: an in-vitro experimental study [1]
- Materials and methods : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant-abutment connection at different cyclic loading: an in-vitro experimental study [2]
- Results : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant-abutment connection at different cyclic loading: an in-vitro experimental study
- Discussion : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant-abutment connection at different cyclic loading: an in-vitro experimental study [1]
- Discussion : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant-abutment connection at different cyclic loading: an in-vitro experimental study [2]
- Discussion : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant-abutment connection at different cyclic loading: an in-vitro experimental study [3]
- Discussion : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant-abutment connection at different cyclic loading: an in-vitro experimental study [4]
- Conclusion : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant-abutment connection at different cyclic loading: an in-vitro experimental study
- Abbreviations : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant-abutment connection at different cyclic loading: an in-vitro experimental study
- References : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant-abutment connection at different cyclic loading: an in-vitro experimental study [1]
- References : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant-abutment connection at different cyclic loading: an in-vitro experimental study [2]
- References : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant-abutment connection at different cyclic loading: an in-vitro experimental study [3]
- References : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant-abutment connection at different cyclic loading: an in-vitro experimental study [4]
- Acknowledgements : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant-abutment connection at different cyclic loading: an in-vitro experimental study
- Author information : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant-abutment connection at different cyclic loading: an in-vitro experimental study
- Ethics declarations : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant-abutment connection at different cyclic loading: an in-vitro experimental study
- Rights and permissions : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant-abutment connection at different cyclic loading: an in-vitro experimental study
- About this article : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant-abutment connection at different cyclic loading: an in-vitro experimental study
- Table 1 Mean removal torque values (N cm) of the abutment screws of the implant-abutment connections in all groups (Of: Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant)
- Table 2 One-way ANOVA for the difference in removal torque values among groups with different numbers of mechanical loading cycles (Of: Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant)
- Table 3 Post hoc Tukey’s HSD test of mean removal torque values in all groups (Of: Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant)
- Fig. 1. Cone connection combined with octalobular index (Octatorx) : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant
- Fig. 2. Schematic of test setup according to The ISO 14801 recommendations : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant
- Fig. 3. Implant assembly embedded in resin block : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant
- Fig. 4. Tightening the abutment screw and measuring the RTVs : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant
- Fig. 5. Specimen mounted in a 30°-angled steel holder in ElectroPuls E1000 dynamic testing machine : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant
- Fig. 6. Specimen mounted in a 30°-angled steel holder : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant
- Fig. 7. Schematic diagram for experimental procedure : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant
- Fig. 8. Change in RTVs according to the numbers of mechanical loading cycles : Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant