References : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [2]
Rachana C, Sridhar N, Rangan AV, Rajani V. Horizontal ridge augmentation using a combination approach. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2012;16:446–50.
Kleinheinz J, Buchter A, Kruse-Losler B, Weingart D, Joos U. Incision design in implant dentistry based on vascularization of the mucosa. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:518–23.
Beitlitum I, Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE. Clinical evaluation of particulate allogeneic with and without autogenous bone grafts and resorbable collagen membranes for bone augmentation of atrophic alveolar ridges. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:1242–50.
Jung RE, Halg GA, Thoma DS, Hammerle CH. A randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate a new membrane for guided bone regeneration around dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:162–8.
McAllister BS. Scalloped implant designs enhance interproximal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007;27:9–15.
Tal H, Kozlovsky A, Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE, Moses O. Cross-linked and non-cross-linked collagen barrier membranes disintegrate following surgical exposure to the oral environment: a histological study in the cat. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:760–6.
Hugoson A, Ravald N, Fornell J, Johard G, Teiwik A, Gottlow J. Treatment of class II furcation involvements in humans with bioresorbable and nonresorbable guided tissue regeneration barriers. A randomized multi-center study. J Periodontol. 1995;66:624–34.
Laurell L, Falk H, Fornell J, Johard G, Gottlow J. Clinical use of a bioresorbable matrix barrier in guided tissue regeneration therapy. Case series J Periodontol. 1994;65:967–75.
Lundgren AK, Sennerby L, Lundgren D, Taylor A, Gottlow J, Nyman S. Bone augmentation at titanium implants using autologous bone grafts and a bioresorbable barrier. An experimental study in the rabbit tibia. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:82–9.
Cortellini P, Tonetti MS, Lang NP, Suvan JE, Zucchelli G, Vangsted T, et al. The simplified papilla preservation flap in the regenerative treatment of deep intrabony defects: clinical outcomes and postoperative morbidity. J Periodontol. 2001;72:1702–12.
Stavropoulos A, Karring T. Long-term stability of periodontal conditions achieved following guided tissue regeneration with bioresorbable membranes: case series results after 6-7 years. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31:939–44.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- Background : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [1]
- Methods : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [1]
- Methods : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [2]
- Results : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- Discussion : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [1]
- Discussion : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [2]
- Conclusions : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- References : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [1]
- References : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [2]
- References : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [3]
- References : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [4]
- Acknowledgements : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- Author information : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- Rights and permissions : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- About this article : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- Table 1 Patient population and demographics and sites : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- Table 2 Baseline and re-entry measurement of the alveolar ridge width : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- Table 3 Alveolar ridge width reduction : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- Fig. 1. Clinical photographs of the both treatment groups after the initial surgery, 1 week post-op and at the re-entry. a) In the test group, no primary wound closure was achieved (left) and the barrier was left exposed for secondary intention healing. After 1 week, the matrix remained exposed (middle) showing no signs of infection. For months later, the exposed area was covered by a keratinized tissue (right). b) In the test group, primary wound closure was achieved at surgery (left). However, the barrier became exposed after 1 week of healing (middle). For months later, exposed area was covered with a keratinized tissue (right). c) In the control group, primary wound closure was achieved (left). After 1 week (middle), primary healing happened without any signs of membrane exposure. For months later, the site healed uneventfully (right) : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge a