References : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [3]
Falk H, Laurell L, Ravald N, Teiwik A, Persson R. Guided tissue regeneration therapy of 203 consecutively treated intrabony defects using a bioabsorbable matrix barrier. Clinical and radiographic findings. J Periodontol. 1997;68:571–81.
Eickholz P, Kim TS, Steinbrenner H, Dorfer C, Holle R. Guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable barriers: intrabony defects and class II furcations. J Periodontol. 2000;71:999–1008.
Christensen DK, Karoussis IK, Joss A, Hammerle CH, Lang NP. Simultaneous or staged installation with guided bone augmentation of transmucosal titanium implants. A 3-year prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14:680–6.
Eskan MA, Greenwell H, Hill M, Morton D, Vidal R, Shumway B, et al. Platelet-rich plasma-assisted guided bone regeneration for ridge augmentation: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2014;85:661–8.
Lundgren D, Sennerby L, Falk H, Friberg B, Nyman S. The use of a new bioresorbable barrier for guided bone regeneration in connection with implant installation. Case Reports Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994;5:177–84.
Dan Lundgren TMaJG. The development of a bioresorbable barrier for guided tissue regeneration. The Journal of The SDA. 1994;86:741-756
Seol KY, Kim SG, Kim HK, Moon SY, Kim BO, Ahn JM, et al. Effects of decortication in the treatment of bone defect around particulate dentin-coated implants: an experimental pilot study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108:529–36.
Fiorellini JP, Nevins ML. Localized ridge augmentation/preservation. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol. 2003;8:321–7.
Verardi S, Simion M. Management of the exposure of e-PTFE membranes in guided bone regeneration. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2007;19:111–7.
Machtei EE. The effect of membrane exposure on the outcome of regenerative procedures in humans: a meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2001;72:512–6.
Tal H, Kozlovsky A, Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE, Moses O. Long-term bio-degradation of cross-linked and non-cross-linked collagen barriers in human guided bone regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:295–302.
Zucchelli G, Pollini F, Clauser C, De Sanctis M. The effect of chlorhexidine mouthrinses on early bacterial colonization of guided tissue regeneration membranes. An in vivo study. J Periodontol. 2000;71:263–71.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- Background : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [1]
- Methods : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [1]
- Methods : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [2]
- Results : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- Discussion : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [1]
- Discussion : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [2]
- Conclusions : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- References : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [1]
- References : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [2]
- References : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [3]
- References : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study [4]
- Acknowledgements : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- Author information : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- Rights and permissions : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- About this article : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- Table 1 Patient population and demographics and sites : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- Table 2 Baseline and re-entry measurement of the alveolar ridge width : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- Table 3 Alveolar ridge width reduction : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge augmentation: a case-controlled study
- Fig. 1. Clinical photographs of the both treatment groups after the initial surgery, 1 week post-op and at the re-entry. a) In the test group, no primary wound closure was achieved (left) and the barrier was left exposed for secondary intention healing. After 1 week, the matrix remained exposed (middle) showing no signs of infection. For months later, the exposed area was covered by a keratinized tissue (right). b) In the test group, primary wound closure was achieved at surgery (left). However, the barrier became exposed after 1 week of healing (middle). For months later, exposed area was covered with a keratinized tissue (right). c) In the control group, primary wound closure was achieved (left). After 1 week (middle), primary healing happened without any signs of membrane exposure. For months later, the site healed uneventfully (right) : The effect of membrane exposure on lateral ridge a