References : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants [2]
An YH, Friedman RJ. Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterial surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;43:338–48.
Palmquist A, Omar OM, Esposito M, Lausmaa J, Thomsen P. Titanium oral implants: surface characteristics, interface biology and clinical outcome. J R Soc Interface. 2010;7:515–27.
Hannig C, Hannig M. The oral cavity—a key system to understand substratum-dependent bioadhesion on solid surfaces in man. Clin Oral Investig. 2009;13:123–39.
Kawai K, Urano M. Adherence of plaque components to different restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2001;26:396–400.
Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials. 1999;20:1–25.
Rimondini L, Cerroni L, Carrassi A, Torricelli P. Bacterial colonization of zirconia ceramic surfaces: an in vitro and in vivo study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:793–8.
Poortinga AT, Bos R, Busscher HJ. Measurement of charge transfer during bacterial adhesion to an indium tin oxide surface in a parallel plate flow chamber. J Microbiol Methods. 1999;38:183–9.
Lima EM, Koo H, Vacca Smith AM, Rosalen PL, Del Bel Cury AA. Adsorption of salivary and serum proteins and bacterial adherence on titanium and zirconia ceramic surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:780–5.
Tanner A, Maiden MF, Lee K, Shulman LB, Weber HP. Dental implant infections. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25:213–7.
Bundy KJ, Butler MF, Hochman RF. An investigation of the bacteriostatic properties of pure metals. J Biomed Mater Res. 1980;14:653–63.
Leonhardt A, Dahlen G. Effect of titanium on selected oral bacterial species in vitro. Eur J Oral Sci. 1995;103:382–7.
Rimondini L, Fare S, Brambilla E, Felloni A, Consonni C, Brossa F, et al. The effect of surface roughness on early in vivo plaque colonization on titanium. J Periodontol. 1997;68:556–62.
Bürgers R, Gerlach T, Hahnel S, Schwarz F, Handel G, Gosau M. In vivo and in vitro biofilm formation on two different titanium implant surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:156–64.
Burgers R, Hahnel S, Reichert TE, Rosentritt M, Behr M, Gerlach T, et al. Adhesion of Candida albicans to various dental implant surfaces and the influence of salivary pellicle proteins. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:2307–13.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants
- Background : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants [1]
- Background : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants [2]
- Methods : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants [1]
- Methods : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants [2]
- Methods : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants [3]
- Results : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants [1]
- Results : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants [2]
- Discussion : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants [1]
- Discussion : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants [2]
- Discussion : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants [3]
- Discussion : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants [4]
- Discussion : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants [5]
- Conclusions : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants
- References : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants [1]
- References : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants [2]
- References : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants [3]
- References : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants [4]
- References : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants [5]
- Acknowledgements : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants
- Author information : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants
- Ethics declarations : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants
- Rights and permissions : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants
- About this article : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants
- Table 1 Arithmetic average of surface roughness Ra (means and standard deviations [μm]) and wettability (means and standard deviations [°]) of the ten tested material : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants
- Fig. 1. AFM images for 30 μm × 30 μm (a–d) and 3 μm × 3 μm scan areas (e–h) of rough ceramic (a, e), smooth ceramic (b, f), rough titanium (c, g), and smooth titanium (d, h) : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implant
- Fig. 2. Comparison of AFM surface profiles of rough ceramic (CeROUGH), smooth ceramic (CeSMOOTH), rough titanium (TiROUGH), and smooth titanium (TiSMOOTH); scan sizes are 30 μm in a and 1 μm in b : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implant
- Fig. 3. Relative fluorescence intensities (rfi) of S. epidermidis (a) and S. sanguinis (b) on titanium and ceramic implant surfaces with different grades of roughness (means and standard deviations) : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implant
- Fig. 4. Relative fluorescence intensities (rfi) of S. epidermidis (a) and S. sanguinis (b) on titanium and ceramic implant surfaces with different grades of roughness and hydrophobicity (means and standard deviations) : The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implant