References : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implants [1]
Ottoni JM, Oliveira ZF, Mansini R, Cabral AM. Correlation between placement torque and survival of single-tooth implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 20:769–76.
Beer A, Gahleitner A, Holm A, Tschabitscher M, Homolka P. Correlation of insertion torques with bone mineral density from dental quantitative CT in the mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003; 14(5):616–20.
Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont. 1998; 11(5):491–501.
Martinez H1, Davarpanah M, Missika P, Celletti R, Lazzara R. Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001; 12(5):423–32.
Lioubavina-Hack N, Lang NP, Karring T. Significance of primary stability for osseointegration of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006; 17(3):244–50.
Molly L. Bone density and primary stability in implant therapy. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006; 17(Suppl 2):124–35.
Orenstein IH, Tarnow DP, Morris HF. Three-year post-placement survival of implants mobile at placement. Ann Periodontol. 2000; 5:32–41.
Turkyilmaz I, Company AM. Sensitivity of resonance frequency analysis method to assess implant stability. NY State Dent J. 2011; 77(5):44–9.
Su YY, Wilmes B, Hönscheid R, Drescher D. Application of a wireless resonance frequency transducer to assess primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants. An in vitro study in pig ilia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24(4):647–54.
Ohta K, Takechi M, Minami M, Shigeishi H, Hiraoka M, Nishimura M, Kamata N. Influence of factors related to implant stability detected by wireless resonance frequency analysis device. J Oral Rehabil. 2010; 37(2):131–7.
Turkyilmaz I. A comparison between insertion torque and resonance frequency in the assessment of torque capacity and primary stability of Brånemark system implants. J Oral Rehabil. 2006; 33(10):754–59.
Herrmann I, Lekholm U, Holm S, Kultje C. Evaluation of patient and implant characteristics as potential prognostic factors for oral implant failures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 20:220–30.
Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. J Periodontol. 1991; 62:2–4.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implants
- Background : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implants [1]
- Background : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implants [2]
- Background : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implants [3]
- Methods : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implants [1]
- Methods : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implants [2]
- Methods : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implants [3]
- Results : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implants
- Discussion : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implants [1]
- Discussion : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implants [2]
- Conclusions : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implants
- References : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implants [1]
- References : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implants [2]
- References : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implants [3]
- Acknowledgements : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implants
- Author information : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implants
- Additional information : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implants
- Rights and permissions : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implants
- About this article : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implants
- Table 1 Correlation between bone factors and stability factors : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implants
- Table 2 Statistical analysis of the results of the multiple regression analysis of the 3.8-mm-width implant : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implants
- Table 3 Statistical analysis of the results of the multiple regression analysis of the 5.0-mm-width implant : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implants
- Figure 1. The bone model in this study (a pig's ilium). (a) The whole picture of the ilium. (b) The flat part of the posterior margin of the ilium. (c) The CT image of the ilium. : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implant
- Figure 2. The implants in this study. Two kinds of diameters (3.8 mm, 5.0 mm) and two kinds of lengths (7.0 mm, 12.0 mm) having a general threadlike shape with a mechanically polished surface. : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implant
- Figure 3. The special implant cavity-forming device. This device is able to adjust the up-and-down movement speed and the rotation speed of the drill. : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implant
- Figure 4. Setting the evaluation site. An implant placement simulation software (Osaka Landmarker ver. 5.0 with special specifications for study purposes, iCAT, Osaka, Japan) was used as the image analysis software. The virtual implant was placed in the implant cavity by simulation. : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implant
- Figure 5. Measurement site of the voxel values. The width of the measurement site was defined as 0.50 mm, i.e., from 0.25 mm inside (the to-be-compressed area at the time of placement) to 0.25 mm outside (the same width of the aforementioned) of the virtual implant. : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implant