Open hour: senin - sabtu 09:00:00 - 20:00:00; minggu & tanggal merah tutup
References : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implants [2]

References : The relationship between the bone characters obtained by CBCT and primary stability of the implants [2]

author: Masahiro Wada, Yasutane Tsuiki, Tohru Suganami, Kazunori Ikebe, Motofumi Sogo, Ikuhisa Okuno, Yoshinobu Maeda | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID

Lekholm U, Zarb G. Patient selection and preparation. In: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc. 1985; p. 199–209

Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. St. Louis: Mosby, 1993; p. 469–85.

Turkyilmaz I, Sennerby L, McGlumphy EA, Tozum TF. Biomechanical aspects of primary implant stability: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009; 11:113–9.

Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19:228–31.

Loubele M, Maes F, Schutyser F, Marchal G, Jacobs R, Suetens P. Assessment of bone segmentation quality of cone-beam CT versus multislice spiral CT: a pilot study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006; 102:225–34.

Schulze D, Heiland M, Thurmann H, Adam G. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004; 33:83–8.

De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 38:609–25.

Kl H, Kawashima S, Araki M, Iwai K, Sawada K, Akiyama Y. Comparison of image performance between cone-beam computed tomography for dental use and four-row multidetector helical CT. J Oral Sci. 2006; 48(1):27–34.

Araki K, Okano T. The effect of surrounding conditions on pixel value of cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24(8):862–5.

Eskandarloo A, Abdinian M, Salemi F, Hashemzadeh Z, Safaei M. Effect of object location on the density measurement in cone beam computed tomography versus multislice computed tomography. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012; 9(Suppl 1):S81–7.

Nackaerts O, Maes F, Yan H, Couto Souza P, Pauwels R, Jacobs R. Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22(8):873–9.

Ikumi N, Tsutsumi S. Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of the bone and cutting torque values at implant placement: a clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 20:253–60.

Serial posts:


id post:
New thoughts
Me:
search
glossary
en in