Results : Performance of the counter-torque technique in the explantation of nonmobile dental implants [1]
In this report, 749 nonmobile dental implants were explanted in 355 patients. Figure 1 shows the anatomical location of the dental implants. The 50.6% of the removed implants were located in the maxilla and 48.2% of the cases were located in the anterior areas. Attending to the causes of explantation, the vast majority of the explantations occurred due to biological complications (86.2%), followed by mechanical complications (11.9%) and surgical intervention (1.9%). Figure 2 shows the distribution of the dental implants according to the cause of implant removal.
The bone level of the explanted implants was homogenously distributed among bone level categories. In this sense, 26.4% of the implants were included in the 0–25% of bone level category, 24.3% in the 26–50% of bone level category, 26.9% in the 51–75% of bone level category and, finally, 22.4% of the explanted implants were in the 76–100% bone level category. The implants were completely covered by bone (100%) in the 76–100% of bone level category were removed due to mechanical problems.
Regarding the success rate, 98.4% of the dental implants were successfully removed following the described procedure. Among these successful explantations, the use of specialized trephine burs was needed in 7.5% of the cases. It was studied if the bone level was associated with the use of trephine burs. There was no statistically significant (p = 0.249) relationship between trephine bar use and bone level.
The extraction kit also demonstrated to cause minimal complications that occurred in 1.3% of the extracted implants. All the detected complications were identified as fractures of the implant. There was no detection of other side effects. From the detected implant fractures, 50% were identified as fissure lines at the implant neck but allowed the successful removal of the implant. The other implant fractures were located at the apical third of the implant body.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Performance of the counter-torque technique in the explantation of nonmobile dental implants
- Background : Performance of the counter-torque technique in the explantation of nonmobile dental implants
- Methods : Performance of the counter-torque technique in the explantation of nonmobile dental implants
- Results : Performance of the counter-torque technique in the explantation of nonmobile dental implants [1]
- Results : Performance of the counter-torque technique in the explantation of nonmobile dental implants [2]
- Discussion : Performance of the counter-torque technique in the explantation of nonmobile dental implants
- Conclusions : Performance of the counter-torque technique in the explantation of nonmobile dental implants
- Availability of data and materials : Performance of the counter-torque technique in the explantation of nonmobile dental implants
- References : Performance of the counter-torque technique in the explantation of nonmobile dental implants
- Acknowledgements : Performance of the counter-torque technique in the explantation of nonmobile dental implants
- Funding : Performance of the counter-torque technique in the explantation of nonmobile dental implants
- Author information : Performance of the counter-torque technique in the explantation of nonmobile dental implants
- Ethics declarations : Performance of the counter-torque technique in the explantation of nonmobile dental implants
- Additional information : Performance of the counter-torque technique in the explantation of nonmobile dental implants
- Rights and permissions : Performance of the counter-torque technique in the explantation of nonmobile dental implants
- About this article : Performance of the counter-torque technique in the explantation of nonmobile dental implants
- Table 1 Description of the implants fractured during the explantation : Performance of the counter-torque technique in the explantation of nonmobile dental implants
- Fig. 1. Frequency distribution of the location of the explanted dental implant : Performance of the counter-torque technique in the explantation of nonmobile dental implant
- Fig. 2. The cause of implant removal : Performance of the counter-torque technique in the explantation of nonmobile dental implant
- Fig. 3. Panoramic radiograph showing excessive marginal bone loss affecting all the dental implants in the mandible supporting fixed prostheses (a). Clinical image showing the advanced bone destruction around the implants at the incisors and left premolar regions (b). Clinical image showing the preservation of the pre-existing bone upon implant removal with the counter-torque regions (c). Panoramic radiograph showing the maintenance at this stage of 3 implants to support the provisional prosthesis in the mandible (d) : Performance of the counter-torque technique in the explantation of nonmobile dental implant
- Fig. 4. Implant placement surgery after 4 months of healing (a). Immediate loading of the new implants and the explanation of the implant at the left first molar (b). Panoramic radiograph showing the case finished with 12 months of follow-up (c). Clinical image showing the definitive screw-retained prostheses (d) : Performance of the counter-torque technique in the explantation of nonmobile dental implant