Table 1 CBCT measurements of sinus mucosal thickening : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
Table 1 CBCT measurements of sinus mucosal thickening : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
author: Bartosz Maska, Guo-Hao Lin, Abdullah Othman, Shabnam Behdin, Suncica Travan, Erika Benavides, Yvonne Kapila | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Patient
Anterior
(E1-floor of the sinus)
Middle
(C1-floor of the sinus)
Posterior
(D1-floor of the sinus)
Thickest
(F-floor of the sinus)
1
3.06
0.32
0.76
4.59
2
0.34
0.21
0.20
0.34
3
0.39
0.54
1.38
1.66
4
4.15
3.79
0.61
6.36
5
5.64
1.33
3.73
8.42
6
7.34
0.77
0.86
7.66
7
1.93
9.25
6.17
12.5
8
8.22
7.89
1.62
12.27
9
3.52
10.05
4.76
10.05
10
7.62
0.43
2.03
8.11
11
7.19
2.75
0.77
7.62
12
0.26
9.26
8.38
9.26
13
0.76
19.50
0.46
22.81
14
14.95
11.33
9.67
18.92
15
0.79
0.71
1.36
1.55
16
0.60
3.34
1.52
4.40
17
4.44
1.82
3.60
12.25
18
1.39
0.68
0.52
8.00
19
0.21
0.24
0.24
0.24
20
16.27
11.11
8.07
16.27
21
2.87
5.10
6.40
7.85
22
5.13
0.64
4.12
5.13
23
1.19
1.36
0.25
2.48
24
0.80
2.39
2.08
4.84
25
19.05
16.94
10.14
20.10
26
3.51
4.25
2.63
4.25
27
0.28
1.62
2.85
2.85
28
9.94
7.21
5.29
11.07
29
2.56
6.28
9.98
9.98
Mean (mm)
4.63
4.87
3.46
8.34
Standard deviation (mm)
4.95
5.10
3.17
5.70
Table 1 CBCT measurements of sinus mucosal thickening
Serial posts:
-
Background : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
-
Methods : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [1]
-
Methods : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [2]
-
Methods : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [3]
-
Results : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
-
Discussion : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [1]
-
Discussion : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [2]
-
Discussion : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [3]
-
Conclusions : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
-
Abbreviations : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
-
References : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [1]
-
References : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [2]
-
References : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [3]
-
References : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [4]
-
Acknowledgements : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
-
Author information : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [1]
-
Author information : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [2]
-
Rights and permissions : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
-
About this article : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
-
Table 1 CBCT measurements of sinus mucosal thickening : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
-
Table 2 Statistical results after inter-variable adjustment showing the association between recorded parameters and sinus mucosal thickening; p values that showed statistically significant differences are italicized : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
-
Fig. 1. Figure illustrating the reference points of the CBCT measurements. A: most posterior point of the sinus wall; B: most anterior point of the sinus wall; C: mid-point between A and B; C1: measurement of mucosal thickening perpendicular to A–B line at point C; D: mid-point between A and C; D1: measurement of mucosal thickening perpendicular to A–B line at point D; E: mid-point between B and C; E1: measurement of mucosal thickening perpendicular to A–B line at point E; F: highest extension of thickened sinus membrane; G–H: height of residual alveolar bone (measured at the mid-point of the edentulous ridge/implant-planned site) : Dental implant
-
Fig. 2. Figure illustrating the proposed mucosal thickening index. A ≤1 mm, indicating no thickening; B >1 mm but ≤2 mm, indicating minimal thickening; C >2 mm but ≤5 mm, indicating moderate thickening; D >5 mm, indicating severe thickening : Dental implant
| Patient |
Anterior (E1-floor of the sinus) |
Middle (C1-floor of the sinus) |
Posterior (D1-floor of the sinus) |
Thickest (F-floor of the sinus) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.06 | 0.32 | 0.76 | 4.59 |
| 2 | 0.34 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.34 |
| 3 | 0.39 | 0.54 | 1.38 | 1.66 |
| 4 | 4.15 | 3.79 | 0.61 | 6.36 |
| 5 | 5.64 | 1.33 | 3.73 | 8.42 |
| 6 | 7.34 | 0.77 | 0.86 | 7.66 |
| 7 | 1.93 | 9.25 | 6.17 | 12.5 |
| 8 | 8.22 | 7.89 | 1.62 | 12.27 |
| 9 | 3.52 | 10.05 | 4.76 | 10.05 |
| 10 | 7.62 | 0.43 | 2.03 | 8.11 |
| 11 | 7.19 | 2.75 | 0.77 | 7.62 |
| 12 | 0.26 | 9.26 | 8.38 | 9.26 |
| 13 | 0.76 | 19.50 | 0.46 | 22.81 |
| 14 | 14.95 | 11.33 | 9.67 | 18.92 |
| 15 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 1.36 | 1.55 |
| 16 | 0.60 | 3.34 | 1.52 | 4.40 |
| 17 | 4.44 | 1.82 | 3.60 | 12.25 |
| 18 | 1.39 | 0.68 | 0.52 | 8.00 |
| 19 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.24 |
| 20 | 16.27 | 11.11 | 8.07 | 16.27 |
| 21 | 2.87 | 5.10 | 6.40 | 7.85 |
| 22 | 5.13 | 0.64 | 4.12 | 5.13 |
| 23 | 1.19 | 1.36 | 0.25 | 2.48 |
| 24 | 0.80 | 2.39 | 2.08 | 4.84 |
| 25 | 19.05 | 16.94 | 10.14 | 20.10 |
| 26 | 3.51 | 4.25 | 2.63 | 4.25 |
| 27 | 0.28 | 1.62 | 2.85 | 2.85 |
| 28 | 9.94 | 7.21 | 5.29 | 11.07 |
| 29 | 2.56 | 6.28 | 9.98 | 9.98 |
| Mean (mm) | 4.63 | 4.87 | 3.46 | 8.34 |
| Standard deviation (mm) | 4.95 | 5.10 | 3.17 | 5.70 |
Table 1 CBCT measurements of sinus mucosal thickening
- Background : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
- Methods : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [1]
- Methods : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [2]
- Methods : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [3]
- Results : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
- Discussion : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [1]
- Discussion : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [2]
- Discussion : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [3]
- Conclusions : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
- Abbreviations : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
- References : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [1]
- References : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [2]
- References : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [3]
- References : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [4]
- Acknowledgements : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
- Author information : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [1]
- Author information : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [2]
- Rights and permissions : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
- About this article : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
- Table 1 CBCT measurements of sinus mucosal thickening : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
- Table 2 Statistical results after inter-variable adjustment showing the association between recorded parameters and sinus mucosal thickening; p values that showed statistically significant differences are italicized : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
- Fig. 1. Figure illustrating the reference points of the CBCT measurements. A: most posterior point of the sinus wall; B: most anterior point of the sinus wall; C: mid-point between A and B; C1: measurement of mucosal thickening perpendicular to A–B line at point C; D: mid-point between A and C; D1: measurement of mucosal thickening perpendicular to A–B line at point D; E: mid-point between B and C; E1: measurement of mucosal thickening perpendicular to A–B line at point E; F: highest extension of thickened sinus membrane; G–H: height of residual alveolar bone (measured at the mid-point of the edentulous ridge/implant-planned site) : Dental implant
- Fig. 2. Figure illustrating the proposed mucosal thickening index. A ≤1 mm, indicating no thickening; B >1 mm but ≤2 mm, indicating minimal thickening; C >2 mm but ≤5 mm, indicating moderate thickening; D >5 mm, indicating severe thickening : Dental implant