Table 1 Descriptive statistics and results of comparison between microstrains induced with different implant design regardless of other variables (collective microstrains) : Peri-implant biomechanical responses to standard, short-wide, and double mini implants replacing missing molar supporting hybrid ceramic or full-metal crowns under axial and off-axial loading: an in vitro study|palmerah.implantgigi.com

Table 1 Descriptive statistics and results of comparison between microstrains induced with different implant design regardless of other variables (collective microstrains) : Peri-implant biomechanical responses to standard, short-wide, and double mini implants replacing missing molar supporting hybrid ceramic or full-metal crowns under axial and off-axial loading: an in vitro study

Table 2 Descriptive statistics and results of comparison between microstrains induced with different implant designs with each crown material (overall microstrains) : Peri-implant biomechanical responses to standard, short-wide, and double mini implants replacing missing molar supporting hybrid ceramic or full-metal crowns under axial and off-axial loading: an in vitro study

Table 3 Descriptive statistics and results of comparison between microstrains induced by the two crown materials regardless of other variables (collective microstrains) : Peri-implant biomechanical responses to standard, short-wide, and double mini implants replacing missing molar supporting hybrid ceramic or full-metal crowns under axial and off-axial loading: an in vitro study

Table 4 Descriptive statistics and results of comparison between microstrains induced by the two load directions regardless of other variables (collective microstrains) : Peri-implant biomechanical responses to standard, short-wide, and double mini implants replacing missing molar supporting hybrid ceramic or full-metal crowns under axial and off-axial loading: an in vitro study

Table 5 Descriptive statistics and results of comparison between microstrains induced by the two load directions with each implant design and crown material (overall microstrains) : Peri-implant biomechanical responses to standard, short-wide, and double mini implants replacing missing molar supporting hybrid ceramic or full-metal crowns under axial and off-axial loading: an in vitro study

Fig. 1. a Standard, b short-wide, and c single-piece mini implants : Peri-implant

Fig. 2. Metal crown supported on two mini implants : Peri-implant

Fig. 3. Lava Ultimate Restorative crown on the two mini implants. : Peri-implant

Fig. 4. Installation of strain gauges on surfaces of epoxy resin adjacent to mini implants : Peri-implant

Fig. 5. Loading of implant axially : Peri-implant

Fig. 6. Loading of implant off-axially : Peri-implant

Standard		Short-wide		Double mini		P value
Mean	SD	Mean	SD	Mean	SD	P value
3362.4^a	757.4	697.6^c	79.7	801.6^b	251.4	<0.001*

Table 1 Descriptive statistics and results of comparison between microstrains induced with different implant design regardless of other variables (collective microstrains)

Serial posts: