Open hour: senin - sabtu 09:00:00 - 20:00:00; minggu & tanggal merah tutup
Table 1 Distribution and description of FD1 and FD2 values, crown-implant ratios, and sex difference between the implant failure and success groups : Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis

Table 1 Distribution and description of FD1 and FD2 values, crown-implant ratios, and sex difference between the implant failure and success groups : Evaluation of the peri-implant bone trabecular microstructure changes in short implants with fractal analysis

author: Hatice Cansu K, Ayegl Gleryz Grbulak | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
 Failure (n)Success (n)P valuePowerEffect size
SexWomen3870.0240.680.21
Men634
FD19
0.82 ± 0.28 (mean)
0.45 (min)–1.26 (max)
121
1.13 ± 0.25 (mean)
0.41 (min)–1.51 (max)
< 0.0010.991.45
FD29
0.97 ± 0.24 (mean)
0.61 (min)–1.36 (max)
121
1.13 ± 0.19 (mean)
0.41 (min)–1.51 (max)
0.0230.990.79
Crown-implant Ratio2
6.51 ± 3.89 (mean)
3.77 (min)–9.27 (max)
65
4.61 ± 1.58 (mean)
2.57 min)–10.67 (max)
0.1010.991.19

Table 1 Distribution and description of FD1 and FD2 values, crown-implant ratios, and sex difference between the implant failure and success groups

Serial posts:


id post:
New thoughts
Me:
search
glossary
en in