Table 1 Features of the subjects included in the study
Table 1 Features of the subjects included in the study
author: Tommaso Grandi,Luigi Svezia,Giovanni Grandi | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
| Number of patients | 42 |
| Males (%) | 18 (42.9%) |
| Females (%) | 24 (57.1%) |
| Mean age at insertion (range) | 62.6 (49–73) |
| Smokers (less than 10 cigarettes/die) | 12 (28.6%) |
| Diseases in history | |
| Controlled diabetes type 2 | 11 (26.2%) |
| Hypertension | 19 (45.2%) |
| Site of insertion | |
| Premolar | 81 (65.3%) |
| Molar | 43 (34.7%) |
| Opposite dentition | |
| Opposing maxillary complete denture | 7 (16.7%) |
| Opposing fixed rehabilitation and natural teeth | 26 (61.9%) |
| Opposing removable prosthesis and natural teeth | 9 (21.4%) |
Serial posts:
- Narrow implants supporting a fixed splinted prostheses
- Background : Narrow implants supporting a fixed splinted prostheses
- Methods : Narrow implants supporting a fixed splinted prostheses (1)
- Methods : Narrow implants supporting a fixed splinted prostheses (2)
- Methods : Narrow implants supporting a fixed splinted prostheses (3)
- Results: Narrow implants supporting a fixed splinted prostheses
- Discussion: Narrow implants supporting a fixed splinted prostheses (1)
- Discussion: Narrow implants supporting a fixed splinted prostheses (2)
- References: Narrow implants supporting a fixed splinted prostheses
- Figure 1. Characteristics of the implants used in the study
- Table 1 Features of the subjects included in the study
- Table 2 Dimensions (diameter and length) and final seating torque of the inserted implants (n = 124)
- Table 4 Comparison of mean bone levels (means ± SD) at different follow-up intervals in different implants diameters groups (2.75 and 3.25 mm)
- Figure 2. Case 1: Example of one case involved in the study. a Preoperative view of a partial edentulism in posterior mandible. b Preoperative CT scan. The width of the ridge was 4 mm. c Four narrow diameter implants were placed and left to a nonsubmerged healing. d Baseline periapical radiograph. e Buccal vieew of the final metal ceramic restoration. f Periapical radiograph at 1 year after loading
- Figure 3. Example of another case involved in the study