Table 2 Dimensions (diameter and length) and final seating torque of the inserted implants (n = 124)
Table 2 Dimensions (diameter and length) and final seating torque of the inserted implants (n = 124)
author: Tommaso Grandi,Luigi Svezia,Giovanni Grandi | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
| Length (mm) | 8 | 18 (14.5%) |
| 10 | 56 (45.2%) | |
| 11.5 | 43 (34.7%) | |
| 13 | 7 (5.6%) | |
| Diameter (mm) | 2.75 | 69 (55.6%) |
| 3.25 | 55 (44.4%) | |
| Insertion torque (Ncm) | 30 | 21 (16.9%) |
| 35 | 16 (12.9%) | |
| 40 | 10 (8.1%) | |
| 45 | 11 (8.9%) | |
| 50 | 32 (25.8%) | |
| 55 | 7 (5.6%) | |
| 60 | 16 (12.9%) | |
| 65 | 5 (4.1%) | |
| 70 | 6 (4.8%) |
Serial posts:
- Narrow implants supporting a fixed splinted prostheses
- Background : Narrow implants supporting a fixed splinted prostheses
- Methods : Narrow implants supporting a fixed splinted prostheses (1)
- Methods : Narrow implants supporting a fixed splinted prostheses (2)
- Methods : Narrow implants supporting a fixed splinted prostheses (3)
- Results: Narrow implants supporting a fixed splinted prostheses
- Discussion: Narrow implants supporting a fixed splinted prostheses (1)
- Discussion: Narrow implants supporting a fixed splinted prostheses (2)
- References: Narrow implants supporting a fixed splinted prostheses
- Figure 1. Characteristics of the implants used in the study
- Table 1 Features of the subjects included in the study
- Table 2 Dimensions (diameter and length) and final seating torque of the inserted implants (n = 124)
- Table 4 Comparison of mean bone levels (means ± SD) at different follow-up intervals in different implants diameters groups (2.75 and 3.25 mm)
- Figure 2. Case 1: Example of one case involved in the study. a Preoperative view of a partial edentulism in posterior mandible. b Preoperative CT scan. The width of the ridge was 4 mm. c Four narrow diameter implants were placed and left to a nonsubmerged healing. d Baseline periapical radiograph. e Buccal vieew of the final metal ceramic restoration. f Periapical radiograph at 1 year after loading
- Figure 3. Example of another case involved in the study