Fig. 3. Example of another case involved in the study. a Preoperative view –premolars and molars are missing in left mandible. b Preoperative CT scan. The width of the ridge was around 4 mm. c Baseline periapical radiograph. Four narrow diameter implants were placed to restore the area. d Buccal view of the final full-contour zirconia restoration. e Periapical radiograph at 1 year after loa...
Fig. 2. Case 1: Example of one case involved in the study. a Preoperative view of a partial edentulism in posterior mandible. b Preoperative CT scan. The width of the ridge was 4 mm. c Four narrow diameter implants were placed and left to a nonsubmerged healing. d Baseline periapical radiograph. e Buccal vieew of the final metal ceramic restoration. f Periapical radiograph at 1 year after loa...
Fig. 1. Characteristics of the implants used in the study: a external macro-design of JDIcon Ultra S, 2.75 mm diameter implant and b external macro-design of JDEvolution S, 3.25 mm diameter implant
Fig. 1. Characteristics of the implants used in the study: a external macro-design of JDIcon Ultra S, 2.75 mm diameter implant and b external macro-design of JDEvolution S, 3.25 mm diameter i...
Diameter 2.75Â mm
Â
 Follow-up
Mean bone level changes (mm) (n = 69)
0–6 months (95% CI) (n = 67)
0–12 months (95% CI) (n = 67)
...
Follow-up
Mean bone level (mm) (n = 124)
Time
0–6 months (95% CI) (n = 121)
0–12 months (95% CI) (n = 121)
...
Length (mm)
8
18 (14.5%)
10
56 (45.2%)
11.5
...
Number of patients
42
Males (%)
18 (42.9%)
Females (%)
24 (57.1%)
...
Grandi, T., Svezia, L. & Grandi, G. Narrow implants (2.75 and 3.25Â mm diameter) supporting a fixed splinted prostheses in posterior regions of mandible: one-year results from a prospective cohort study.
Int J Implant Dent 3, 43 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-017-0102-6
Download citation
Received: 23 March 2017
Accepted: 29 August 2017
Published: 08 September 2017
...
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were...
Tommaso Grandi serves as a consultant for JDentalCare. Luigi Svezia and Giovanni Grandi declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Private practice, Via Contrada 323, 41126, Modena, Italy
Tommaso Grandi & Luigi Svezia
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Pediatrics, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
Giovanni Grandi
You can also search for this author in
PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in
PubMed Google Scholar
You can ...
Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Maghaireh H, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(3):CD003878. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003878.pub5.
Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, Karatzopoulos G, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. The efficacy of horizontal and vertical bone augmentation procedures for...
Within the limits of this prospective cohort study, narrow-diameter implants (2.75 to 3.25Â mm) can be successfully used as a minimally invasive alternative to horizontal bone augmentation in posterior mandible up to 1Â year of function. This outcome could be related to the fact that these implants have been all splinted to other implants by a fixed prosthesis. These preliminary results must be co...
On the one hand, due to the small sample size of this study and moreover, the short follow-up (only 1Â year after loading), it would be hazardous to conclude that the placement of NDIs to support fixed prostheses in posterior mandible is a predictable treatment modality. In order to draw more reliable conclusions, we need to wait for longer follow-ups, since it may be possible that after several y...
Dental implants with a reduced diameter are commonly used where bone width is narrow or in cases of restricted mesiodistal anatomy such as laterally maxillary and mandibular incisors. They could also be a viable alternative to bone augmentation especially in challenging situations such as the posterior regions of the mandible. While it has been shown that it is possible to horizontally augment bon...
The radiographic data are summarized in Tables 3 and 4. The group lost statistically significant marginal peri-implant bone at 6 months (−0.20; 95% C −0.14: −0.26, pÂ
Forty-eight patients were screened for eligibility, but six subjects were not included for the following reasons: five patients (10.4%) were hesitant to receive implant treatment, and one patient (2.1%) was treated with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates. Forty-two patients were then considered eligible and were consecutively enrolled in the study. All patients were treated according to the allocat...
Primary outcome measures were as follows:
Implant failure: evaluated as implant mobility and removal of stable implants dictated by progressive marginal bone loss or infection. The stability of each implant was measured manually by tightening the abutment screw with a wrench delivering a torque of 20Â Ncm. Implant stability assessment was performed at delivery of definitive crowns (3Â months afte...
The present prospective study was conducted at a private practice (Tommaso Grandi, Modena) in Italy between October 2014 and January 2016.
Any patient with partial edentulism in posterior regions of mandible (premolar/molar areas), requiring one multiple tooth implant-supported restoration (2-, 3-, or 4-unit bridge), having a residual bone height of at least 8Â mm and a thickness of at least 4Â m...
The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate the outcome of narrow-diameter implants (2.75 and 3.25 mm diameter) used as definitive implants in patients with insufficient bone ridge thickness for placing standard-diameter implants in posterior regions of the mandible. The present study reports the clinical outcome up to 1 year after loading. It is planned to follow up this patients’ cohort to ...
Historically, implants have been used and documented mainly with diameters between 3.7 and 4.3Â mm. Employing these diameters for numerous indications, scientifically substantiated treatment protocols with excellent long-term results have been established [1]. One disadvantage of a standard-diameter implant is the fact that, in clinical use, the available horizontal crestal dimensions of the alveo...
Can multiple splinted narrow-diameter implants be used as definitive implants in patients with insufficient bone ridge thickness in posterior regions of the mandible? With this aim, we evaluated their outcomes in this set up to 1Â year after loading.
Forty-two patients with a mean age of 61.3 years old (range 49–73) in need of fixed prosthetic implant-supported rehabilitations in the posterior...
Â
Figure 3. Example of another case involved in the study. a Preoperative view –premolars and molars are missing in left mandible. b Preoperative CT scan. The width of the ridge was around 4 mm. c Baseline periapical radiograph. Four narrow diameter implants were placed to restore the area. d Buccal view of the final full-contour zirconia restoration. e Periapical radiograph at 1Â...
Â
Figure 2. Case 1: Example of one case involved in the study. a Preoperative view of a partial edentulism in posterior mandible. b Preoperative CT scan. The width of the ridge was 4 mm. c Four narrow diameter implants were placed and left to a nonsubmerged healing. d Baseline periapical radiograph. e Buccal vieew of the final metal ceramic restoration. f Periapical radiograph at ...
Diameter 2.75Â mm
Â
 Follow-up
Mean bone level changes (mm) (n = 69)
0–6 months (95% CI) (n = 67)
0–12 months (95% CI) (n = 67)
p inter-groups
 Baseline
0.02 ± 0.07
−0.18 (−0.09; −0.27)
−0.47 (−0.27; −0.67)
p = 0.786
 6 months
0.20 ± 0.12
p intra-group
 12 months
0.49 ± 0.30
pÂ
Length (mm)
8
18 (14.5%)
10
56 (45.2%)
11.5
43 (34.7%)
13
7 (5.6%)
Diameter (mm)
2.75
69 (55.6%)
3.25
55 (44.4%)
Insertion torque (Ncm)
30
21 (16.9%)
35
16 (12.9%)
40
10 (8.1%)
45
11 (8.9%)
50
32 (25.8%)
55
7 (5.6%)
60
16 (12.9%)
65
5 (4.1%)
70
6 (4.8%)
Number of patients
42
Males (%)
18 (42.9%)
Females (%)
24 (57.1%)
Mean age at insertion (range)
62.6 (49–73)
Smokers (less than 10 cigarettes/die)
12 (28.6%)
Diseases in history
 Controlled diabetes type 2
11 (26.2%)
 Hypertension
19 (45.2%)
Site of insertion
 Premolar
81 (65.3%)
 Molar
43 (34.7%)
Opposite dentition
...
Â
Figure 1. Characteristics of the implants used in the study: a external macro-design of JDIcon Ultra S, 2.75 mm diameter implant and b external macro-design of JDEvolution S, 3.25 mm diameter implant
References
Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Maghaireh H, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(3):CD003878. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003878.pub5.
Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, Karatzopoulos G, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. The efficacy of horizontal and vertical bone augmenta...
Klein et al., in a recent systematic review, reported that the survival rate of implants with a diameter of
Discussion
Dental implants with a reduced diameter are commonly used where bone width is narrow or in cases of restricted mesiodistal anatomy such as laterally maxillary and mandibular incisors. They could also be a viable alternative to bone augmentation especially in challenging situations such as the posterior regions of the mandible. While it has been shown that it is possible to horizo...
Results
Forty-eight patients were screened for eligibility, but six subjects were not included for the following reasons: five patients (10.4%) were hesitant to receive implant treatment, and one patient (2.1%) was treated with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates. Forty-two patients were then considered eligible and were consecutively enrolled in the study. All patients were treated according to ...
Secondary outcome measures were as follows:
Peri-implant marginal bone level changes: evaluated on intraoral radiographs taken with the paralleling technique at implant placement, 6Â months and 1Â year after loading. All measurements were taken by an independent assessor (LS). Radiographs were scanned, digitized in JPG format, converted to TIFF format with a 600Â dpi resolution, and stored in...
On the day of surgery, patients were treated under local anesthesia.
Full-thickness crestal flaps were elevated with a minimal extension to reduce patient discomfort. The implant sites were prepared according to the procedure recommended by the implant manufacturer (JDentalCare, Modena, Italy).
Tapered narrow-diameter implants titanium grade 5 (2.75 and 3.25 mm diameter, respectively, JDIcon Ult...
Methods
The present prospective study was conducted at a private practice (Tommaso Grandi, Modena) in Italy between October 2014 and January 2016.
Any patient with partial edentulism in posterior regions of mandible (premolar/molar areas), requiring one multiple tooth implant-supported restoration (2-, 3-, or 4-unit bridge), having a residual bone height of at least 8 mm and a thickness of at ...
Background
Historically, implants have been used and documented mainly with diameters between 3.7 and 4.3Â mm. Employing these diameters for numerous indications, scientifically substantiated treatment protocols with excellent long-term results have been established [1]. One disadvantage of a standard-diameter implant is the fact that, in clinical use, the available horizontal crestal dimension...
Narrow implants (2.75 and 3.25Â mm diameter) supporting a fixed splinted prostheses in posterior regions of mandible: one-year results from a prospective cohort study
Â
Abstract
Background
Can multiple splinted narrow-diameter implants be used as definitive implants in patients with insufficient bone ridge thickness in posterior regions of the mandible? With this aim, we evaluated their out...