Table 1 Removal torque value (Ncm) of three implants immediate removed (IR) per animal : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs
Table 1 Removal torque value (Ncm) of three implants immediate removed (IR) per animal : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs
author: Ricardo de Oliveira Silva, Fabrcio Passador, Paulo Henrique Ferreira Caria | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Animal
Mean
Standard deviation
Minimum
Maximum
1
98.3
5.5
92.2
103.3
2
91.6
9.1
82.1
102.5
3
105.3
8.3
100.4
115.0
4
71.6
10.5
61.2
82.2
5
78.6
5.8
72.7
83.1
6
88.6
6.6
81
93.6
Table 1 Removal torque value (Ncm) of three implants immediate removed (IR) per animal
Serial posts:
-
Introduction : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [1]
-
Introduction : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [2]
-
Materials and methods : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [1]
-
Materials and methods : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [2]
-
Materials and methods : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [3]
-
Results : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [1]
-
Results : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [2]
-
Discussion : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [1]
-
Discussion : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [2]
-
Discussion : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [3]
-
Conclusion : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs
-
References : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [1]
-
References : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [2]
-
References : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [3]
-
References : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [4]
-
References : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [5]
-
References : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [6]
-
Acknowledgements : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs
-
Author information : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs
-
Rights and permissions : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs
-
About this article : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs
-
Table 1 Removal torque value (Ncm) of three implants immediate removed (IR) per animal : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs
-
Table 2 Removal torque value (Ncm) of three implants removed after 9 months (9M) per animal : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs
-
Table 3 Data showing the expression of osteocalcin in both experimental situations 9M and IR. Osteocalcin values considered (u/pixels) (P < 0.05) : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs
-
Table 4 Data showing the expression of collagen I in both experimental situations 9M and IR. Collagen I values considered (u/pixel) (P < 0.05) : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs
-
Fig. 3. Prothesis fixed installed on the three implants : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implant
-
Fig. 4. Representative photomicrographs of each third of the peri-implant bone of 9M experimental condition (H&E, ×40). a First third (cervical third). b Intermediate third. c Apical third. Bone grooving with no altered contour : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implant
-
Fig. 5. Representative photomicrographs of each third of the peri-implant bone of IR experimental condition (H&E, ×40). a First third (cervical third). b Intermediate third. c Apical third. Note the edges of bone grooving present rounded contour, mainly in the last third : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implant
-
Fig. 6. Immunohistochemical staining of osteocalcin (a) and collagen I (c) in sections from mini pigs mandible from 9M and IR osteocalcin (b) and collagen I (d). There were statistically significant differences to osteocalcin in 9M samples and no statistically significant differences to collagen I samples. Magnification: ×40 (a, b) and ×100 (c, d) : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implant
| Animal | Mean | Standard deviation | Minimum | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 98.3 | 5.5 | 92.2 | 103.3 |
| 2 | 91.6 | 9.1 | 82.1 | 102.5 |
| 3 | 105.3 | 8.3 | 100.4 | 115.0 |
| 4 | 71.6 | 10.5 | 61.2 | 82.2 |
| 5 | 78.6 | 5.8 | 72.7 | 83.1 |
| 6 | 88.6 | 6.6 | 81 | 93.6 |
Table 1 Removal torque value (Ncm) of three implants immediate removed (IR) per animal
- Introduction : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [1]
- Introduction : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [2]
- Materials and methods : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [1]
- Materials and methods : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [2]
- Materials and methods : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [3]
- Results : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [1]
- Results : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [2]
- Discussion : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [1]
- Discussion : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [2]
- Discussion : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [3]
- Conclusion : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs
- References : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [1]
- References : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [2]
- References : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [3]
- References : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [4]
- References : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [5]
- References : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs [6]
- Acknowledgements : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs
- Author information : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs
- Rights and permissions : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs
- About this article : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs
- Table 1 Removal torque value (Ncm) of three implants immediate removed (IR) per animal : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs
- Table 2 Removal torque value (Ncm) of three implants removed after 9 months (9M) per animal : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs
- Table 3 Data showing the expression of osteocalcin in both experimental situations 9M and IR. Osteocalcin values considered (u/pixels) (P < 0.05) : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs
- Table 4 Data showing the expression of collagen I in both experimental situations 9M and IR. Collagen I values considered (u/pixel) (P < 0.05) : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants—a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs
- Fig. 3. Prothesis fixed installed on the three implants : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implant
- Fig. 4. Representative photomicrographs of each third of the peri-implant bone of 9M experimental condition (H&E, ×40). a First third (cervical third). b Intermediate third. c Apical third. Bone grooving with no altered contour : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implant
- Fig. 5. Representative photomicrographs of each third of the peri-implant bone of IR experimental condition (H&E, ×40). a First third (cervical third). b Intermediate third. c Apical third. Note the edges of bone grooving present rounded contour, mainly in the last third : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implant
- Fig. 6. Immunohistochemical staining of osteocalcin (a) and collagen I (c) in sections from mini pigs mandible from 9M and IR osteocalcin (b) and collagen I (d). There were statistically significant differences to osteocalcin in 9M samples and no statistically significant differences to collagen I samples. Magnification: ×40 (a, b) and ×100 (c, d) : Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implant