Table 2 Comparison of BIC percentages of 3 mm crestal area of the implants at 3-month follow-up
Table 2 Comparison of BIC percentages of 3 mm crestal area of the implants
author: Murat Ulu,Erdem Kl,Emrah Soylu,Mehmet Krk, Alper Alkan | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Table 2 Comparison of BIC percentages of 3 mm crestal area of the implants at 3-month follow-up
| Group 1 [Mean ± SD] |
Group 2 [Mean ± SD] |
Group3 [Mean ± SD] |
Group 4 [Mean ± SD] |
p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77.67 ± 5.03 | 75.28 ± 10.65 | 71.86 ± 8.34 | 80.63 ± 5.58 | .144* |
Serial posts:
- Reusing dental implants
- Background : Reusing dental implants
- Methods : Reusing dental implants (1)
- Methods : Reusing dental implants (2)
- Methods : Reusing dental implants (3)
- Methods : Reusing dental implants (4)
- Results : Reusing dental implants
- Discussion : Reusing dental implants (1)
- Discussion : Reusing dental implants (2)
- Discussion : Reusing dental implants (3)
- Table 1 Comparison of BIC percentages of over the entire implant length at 3-month follow-up
- Table 2 Comparison of BIC percentages of 3 mm crestal area of the implants
- Table 3 Inter- and intra-group ISQ analysis and measurements on day of surgery and at 3-month follow-up
- Figure 1. Flowchart of the research design employed in the study
- Figure 2. Edentulous posterior mandible of the dog at 3 months after tooth extraction
- Figure 3. Silk ligatures placed in a submarginal position around the implants
- Figure 4. A 2-month period was allowed for plaque retention and peri-implantitis
- Figure 5. Time arrow about the stages of the study
- Figure 6. BIC percentage measured with ImageJ analysis software