Open hour: senin - sabtu 09:00:00 - 20:00:00; minggu & tanggal merah tutup
Table 2 Summary of implant survival and implant success in autogenous bone grafts

Table 3 Implant survival in autogenous bone grafts placed in vascularised and non-vascularised bone grafts

author: Dominic P Laverty,Robert Kelly,Owen Addison | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
  Non-vascularised bone graft Vascularised bone graft
Author Year of publication No. of patients who had implants placed into non-vascularised autogenous bone grafts (and failures) Overall patient implant survival in non-vascularised autogenous bone grafts No. of implants placed into non-vascularised autogenous bone grafts (and failures) Overall implant survival in non-vascularised autogenous bone grafts No. of patients who had implants placed into vascularized autogenous bone grafts (and failures) Overall patient implant survival in vascularised autogenous bone grafts No. of implants placed into vascularised autogenous bone grafts (and failures) Overall implant survival in vascularised autogenous bone grafts
Studies with an average follow-up of 3 years or greater
Watzinger et al. 1996 Not reported N/A 33 (13) 60.6%* Not reported N/A 19 (1) 94.7%*
Teoh et al.  2005 N/A N/A N/A N/A 22 (2) 90.9%* 71 (3) 95.8%*
Wu et al.  2008 N/A N/A N/A N/A 29 (not reported) N/A 100 (9) 91%
Fenlon et al.  2012 N/A N/A N/A N/A 41 (10) 75.6%* 145 (18) 87.5%*
Ch’ng et al.  2014 N/A N/A N/A N/A 54 (10) 81.5%* 243 (20) 91.8%
Shaw et al.  2005 2 (1) 50%* 8 (2) 75%* 31 (11) 64.5%* 115 (30) 73.9%*
Wang et al.  2015 N/A N/A N/A N/A 19 (0) 100% 51 (0) 100%*
Yerit et al.  2006 Not reported N/A Not reported N/A Not reported N/A Not reported N/A
Linsen et al. 2009 Not reported N/A 79 (8) 89.9%* N/A N/A N/A N/A
Studies with an average follow-up of less than 3 years or no average follow-up reported
Fierz et al.  2013 N/A N/A N/A N/A Not reported N/A Not reported N/A
Barrowman et al. 2011 Not reported N/A 6 (0) 100%* Not reported N/A 32 (5) 84.4%*
Zou et al.  2013 N/A N/A N/A N/A 32 (not reported) N/A 110 (5) 96.4%
Schultes et al.  2002 N/A N/A N/A N/A 38 (2) 94.7%* 96 (2) 97.9%*
Buddula et al. 2010 Not reported N/A Not reported N/A Not reported N/A Not reported N/A
Klein et al. 2009 Not reported N/A 128 (22) 82.8%* N/A N/A N/A N/A
Burgess et al. 2017 N/A N/A N/A N/A 59 (not reported) N/A 199 (11) 93.6%
Chiapasco et al. 2006 N/A N/A N/A N/A 14 (1) 92.9%* 62 (1) 98.3%*
Chiapasco et al. 2008 16 (1) 93.8%* 60 (2) 96.7%* N/A N/A N/A N/A
Chiapasco et al. 2000 10 (1) 90%* 41 (2) 95.1%* 8 (1) 87.5%* 31 (1) 96.8%*
Hessling et al. 2015 Not Reported N/A 62 (4) 93.5%* Not reported N/A 31 (4) 87.1%*

 

Serial posts:


id post:
New thoughts
Me:
search
glossary
en in