Table 5 Patient satisfaction at 6 and 12 months, number of patients (%) : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps
Table 5 Patient satisfaction at 6 and 12 months, number of patients (%) : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps
author: Michel Dard, Makoto Shiota, Minoru Sanda, Yasutomo Yajima, Hideshi Sekine, Shohei Kasugai | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Indicator
Prosthetic comforta
Appearanceb
Ability to chewc
Ability to tasted
Fittinge
General satisfactionf
Treatment arm
Timeline (months)
6
12
6
12
6
12
6
12
6
12
6
12
Early loading N = 38
Highly satisfied
12 (31.6)
11 (28.9)
14 (36.8)
14 (36.8)
10 (26.3)
12 (31.6)
11 (28.9)
16 (42.1)
11 (28.9)
9 (23.7)
14 (36.8)
14 (36.8)
Satisfied
25 (65.8)
26 (68.4)
22 (57.9)
24 (63.2)
26 (68.4)
24 (63.2)
25 (65.8)
21 (55.3)
25 (65.8)
29 (76.3)
23 (60.5)
24 (63.2)
No opinion
1 (2.6)
0 (0.0)
2 (5.3)
0 (0.0)
2 (5.3)
2 (5.3)
2 (5.3)
1 (2.6)
2 (5.3)
0 (0.0)
1 (2.6)
0 (0.0)
Dissatisfied
0 (0.0)
1 (2.6)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
Highly dissatisfied
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
Conventional loading N = 37
Highly satisfied
14 (37.8)
13 (35.1)
14 (37.8)
12 (32.4)
11 (29.7)
14 (37.8)
17 (45.9)
18 (48.6)
12 (32.4)
8 (21.6)
19 (51.4)
17 (45.9)
Satisfied
21 (56.8)
24 (64.9)
20 (54.1)
24 (64.9)
23 (62.2)
21 (56.8)
16 (43.2)
18 (48.6)
16 (43.2)
21 (56.8)
17 (45.9)
19 (51.4)
No opinion
2 (5.4)
0 (0.0)
2 (5.4)
1 (2.7)
3 (8.1)
2 (5.4)
4 (10.8)
1 (2.7)
7 (18.9)
6 (16.2)
1 (2.7)
1 (2.7)
Dissatisfied
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
1 (2.7)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
2 (5.4)
1 (2.7)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
Highly dissatisfied
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
1 (2.7)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
Table 5 Patient satisfaction at 6 and 12 months, number of patients (%)
Serial posts:
-
Abstract : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps
-
Background : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [1]
-
Background : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [2]
-
Methods : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [1]
-
Methods : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [2]
-
Methods : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [3]
-
Methods : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [4]
-
Results : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [1]
-
Results : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [2]
-
Discussion : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [1]
-
Discussion : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [2]
-
Discussion : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [3]
-
Conclusions : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps
-
References : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [1]
-
References : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [2]
-
References : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [3]
-
References : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [4]
-
References : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [5]
-
References : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [6]
-
References : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [7]
-
References : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [8]
-
Acknowledgements : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps
-
Author information : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps
-
Additional information : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps
-
Rights and permissions : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps
-
About this article : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps
-
Table 1 Inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps
-
Table 2 Loading criteria applied at implant placement surgery (loading criteria 1 (LC1)) and attachment of provisional restoration (loading criteria 2 (LC2)) : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps
-
Table 3 Patient demographics and other baseline characteristics (PPS) : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps
-
Table 4 Mean crestal bone level changes, in early loading and conventional loading arms (PPS), 6 months after implant placement : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps
-
Table 5 Patient satisfaction at 6 and 12 months, number of patients (%) : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps
-
Fig. 1. Clinical pictures in each procedure. a Before implant placement. b After abutment connection. c Temporary prosthesis. d Final prosthesis : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implant
| Indicator | Prosthetic comforta | Appearanceb | Ability to chewc | Ability to tasted | Fittinge | General satisfactionf | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment arm | Timeline (months) | 6 | 12 | 6 | 12 | 6 | 12 | 6 | 12 | 6 | 12 | 6 | 12 |
| Early loading N = 38 | Highly satisfied | 12 (31.6) | 11 (28.9) | 14 (36.8) | 14 (36.8) | 10 (26.3) | 12 (31.6) | 11 (28.9) | 16 (42.1) | 11 (28.9) | 9 (23.7) | 14 (36.8) | 14 (36.8) |
| Satisfied | 25 (65.8) | 26 (68.4) | 22 (57.9) | 24 (63.2) | 26 (68.4) | 24 (63.2) | 25 (65.8) | 21 (55.3) | 25 (65.8) | 29 (76.3) | 23 (60.5) | 24 (63.2) | |
| No opinion | 1 (2.6) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (5.3) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (5.3) | 2 (5.3) | 2 (5.3) | 1 (2.6) | 2 (5.3) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.6) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Dissatisfied | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Highly dissatisfied | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Conventional loading N = 37 | Highly satisfied | 14 (37.8) | 13 (35.1) | 14 (37.8) | 12 (32.4) | 11 (29.7) | 14 (37.8) | 17 (45.9) | 18 (48.6) | 12 (32.4) | 8 (21.6) | 19 (51.4) | 17 (45.9) |
| Satisfied | 21 (56.8) | 24 (64.9) | 20 (54.1) | 24 (64.9) | 23 (62.2) | 21 (56.8) | 16 (43.2) | 18 (48.6) | 16 (43.2) | 21 (56.8) | 17 (45.9) | 19 (51.4) | |
| No opinion | 2 (5.4) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (5.4) | 1 (2.7) | 3 (8.1) | 2 (5.4) | 4 (10.8) | 1 (2.7) | 7 (18.9) | 6 (16.2) | 1 (2.7) | 1 (2.7) | |
| Dissatisfied | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (5.4) | 1 (2.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Highly dissatisfied | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
Table 5 Patient satisfaction at 6 and 12 months, number of patients (%)
- Abstract : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps
- Background : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [1]
- Background : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [2]
- Methods : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [1]
- Methods : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [2]
- Methods : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [3]
- Methods : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [4]
- Results : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [1]
- Results : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [2]
- Discussion : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [1]
- Discussion : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [2]
- Discussion : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [3]
- Conclusions : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps
- References : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [1]
- References : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [2]
- References : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [3]
- References : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [4]
- References : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [5]
- References : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [6]
- References : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [7]
- References : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps [8]
- Acknowledgements : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps
- Author information : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps
- Additional information : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps
- Rights and permissions : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps
- About this article : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps
- Table 1 Inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps
- Table 2 Loading criteria applied at implant placement surgery (loading criteria 1 (LC1)) and attachment of provisional restoration (loading criteria 2 (LC2)) : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps
- Table 3 Patient demographics and other baseline characteristics (PPS) : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps
- Table 4 Mean crestal bone level changes, in early loading and conventional loading arms (PPS), 6 months after implant placement : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps
- Table 5 Patient satisfaction at 6 and 12 months, number of patients (%) : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implants in single tooth gaps
- Fig. 1. Clinical pictures in each procedure. a Before implant placement. b After abutment connection. c Temporary prosthesis. d Final prosthesis : A randomized, 12-month controlled trial to evaluate non-inferiority of early compared to conventional loading of modSLA implant