Discussion : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [2]
Due to the fact that constant flows were generated within the parallel flow chamber only, the situations of in vitro experiments differ from in vivo setting where dynamic flow profiles are particular [33]. As the constant laminar flow profile is not physiological in bones [34], vessels and other tissues [35], the informative value of the experimental setting is limited but it could be used for various cell proliferation and differentiation modulations. In accordance with this, constant laminar flows were rated to have more impact on target cells than pulsatile and oscillating flow profiles. With regard to these findings, the flow profile generated within the reported device meets the requirements to induce cell morphology changes by FSS.
In addition, when using the new flow chamber, an additive effect of FSS and centrifugal forces on the cells could be seen. Other flow chambers did not reveal this phenomenon due to the fact that the liquid flow moves along a stationary cell surface only [4, 10, 22].
When comparing this new fluid flow chambers with other reported devices [4, 10], several differences are seen. Commonly, test cells are placed on a fixed surface with the culture medium flowing along. According to the method of flow generation, they can be classified into open and sealed systems. Open systems, which are hydrostatically driven, are characterised by a fluid flow that passes the stationary phase once only [36]. In sealed models, the culture medium recirculates pump driven through the system [22]. Due to their inherent system-related drawbacks such as turbulent flow generation on boundary surfaces, those flow chambers are inappropriate for laminar flow creation. However, open systems have benefits of allowing the use of different culture media in a row without ceasing the fluid shear stress. Therefore, one can easily enable or disable different stimuli by exchanging the culture medium to evaluate its cellular impact. Sealed systems such as reported in this study do not provide this option. Initially added substances within the culture medium cannot be eliminated during the experimental process. Instead, stopping the flow and draining the cells would be necessary which would cause another unwanted influence to the test cells.
Serial posts:
- Background : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [1]
- Background : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [2]
- Methods : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [1]
- Methods : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [2]
- Results : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [1]
- Results : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [2]
- Discussion : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [1]
- Discussion : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [2]
- Discussion : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [3]
- Conclusions : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up
- Abbreviations : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up
- References : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [1]
- References : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [2]
- References : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [3]
- References : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [4]
- Acknowledgements : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up
- Author information : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [1]
- Author information : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [2]
- Rights and permissions : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up
- About this article : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up
- Table 1 Listing of the single components of the flow chamber together with manufacturers’ data : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up
- Table 2 Listing of the culture media and additives together with manufacturers’ data : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up
- Fig. 1. Three-dimensional illustration (a–e) and photography (f) of the experimental setup with the components marked numerical. a1 Lower petri dish (s’ bottom serving as the lower plate); 2 Rotating glass panel [60 mm diameter (cell bearing)]; 3 Titanium axis. b4 Liquid medium (red). c5 Reversed upper petri dish. d6 Gearwheel with set screw. e7 Closing; 8 Electronic motor device and adjusting ring with additional set screw : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant
- Fig. 2. Side view of a computerized simulation, showing the flow chambers’ lower compartment and the flow profile in between the two plates; shearing gap and bottom plate are shown on the left side; rotation speed = 200 rpm; colour code bar (left edge) showing shear force values [Pa] [1 Pa = 10 dyn/cm2]; flow direction presented by arrows : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant
- Fig. 3. Diagram for visualisation of the calculation of shear stress rates taking into account the centrifugal force and the glass plates’ dimensions. For example, at a distance of 25 mm from the centre of the upper plate, the shear forces’ value is 8.33 dyn/cm2, together with an additional centrifugal force that has a value of 0.55 dyn/cm2 : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant
- Fig. 4. Randomly orientated osteoblasts without influence of rotation (phallacidin fluorescence staining). On the left side with 200× and on the right side with 400× magnification. The white X on the coloured circle marks the location upon the plate where the osteoblasts were located. The red X marks the centre of the plate : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant
- Fig. 5. Osteoblasts with an orientation tendency after 24 h of rotation (phallacidin fluorescence staining). On the left side with 200× and on the right side with 400× magnification. The yellow arrows show the orientation of the cells. The red arched arrow within the coloured circle shows the direction of rotation. The dashed white line oriented to the right stands for the resulting centrifugal force. The dashed white line pointing upwards shows the direction of the resulting flow resistance. The solid white arrow stands for the vectorial sum of the abovementioned forces : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant