References : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [2]
Becker J, Kirsch A, Schwarz F, Chatzinikolaidou M, Rothamel D, Lekovic V, et al. Bone apposition to titanium implants biocoated with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2). A pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Investig. 2006;10(3):217–24.
Hung CT, Allen FD, Pollack SR, Brighton CT. What is the role of the convective current density in the real-time calcium response of cultured bone cells to fluid flow? J Biomech. 1996;29(11):1403–9.
Ryder KD, Duncan RL. Parathyroid hormone enhances fluid shear-induced [Ca2+](i) signaling in osteoblastic cells through activation of mechanosensitive and voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channels. J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16(2):240–8.
Rath AL, Bonewald LF, Ling J, Jiang JX, Van Dyke ME, Nicolella DP. Correlation of cell strain in single osteocytes with intracellular calcium, but not intracellular nitric oxide, in response to fluid flow. J Biomech. 2010;43(8):1560–4.
Klein-Nulend J, van der Plas A, Semeins CM, Ajubi NE, Frangos JA, Nijweide PJ, et al. Sensitivity of osteocytes to biomechanical stress in vitro. FASEB J. 1995;9(5):441–5.
Klein-Nulend J, Semeins CM, Ajubi NE, Nijweide PJ, Burger EH. Pulsating fluid flow increases nitric oxide (NO) synthesis by osteocytes but not periosteal fibroblasts—correlation with prostaglandin upregulation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995;217(2):640–8.
Mcgarry JG, Klein-Nulend J, Mullender MG, Prendergast PJ. A comparison of strain and fluid shear stress in stimulating bone cell responses—a computational and experimental study. FASEB J. 2005;19(3):482–4.
Nauman EA, Satcher RL, Keaveny TM, Halloran BP, Bikle DD. Osteoblasts respond to pulsatile fluid flow with short-term increases in PGE(2) but no change in mineralization. J Appl Physiol. 2001;90(5):1849–54.
Galbraith CG, Yamada KM, Sheetz MP. The relationship between force and focal complex development. J Cell Biol. 2002;159(4):695–705.
Orr AW, Ginsberg MH, Shattil SJ, Deckmyn H, Schwartz MA. Matrix-specific suppression of integrin activation in shear stress signaling. Mol Biol Cell. 2006;17(11):4686–97.
Chen NX, Ryder KD, Pavalko FM, Turner CH, Burr DB, Qiu J, et al. Ca(2+) regulates fluid shear-induced cytoskeletal reorganization and gene expression in osteoblasts. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2000;278(5):C989–97.
Serial posts:
- Background : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [1]
- Background : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [2]
- Methods : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [1]
- Methods : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [2]
- Results : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [1]
- Results : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [2]
- Discussion : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [1]
- Discussion : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [2]
- Discussion : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [3]
- Conclusions : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up
- Abbreviations : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up
- References : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [1]
- References : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [2]
- References : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [3]
- References : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [4]
- Acknowledgements : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up
- Author information : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [1]
- Author information : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up [2]
- Rights and permissions : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up
- About this article : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up
- Table 1 Listing of the single components of the flow chamber together with manufacturers’ data : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up
- Table 2 Listing of the culture media and additives together with manufacturers’ data : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces—establishment of a novel experimental set up
- Fig. 1. Three-dimensional illustration (a–e) and photography (f) of the experimental setup with the components marked numerical. a1 Lower petri dish (s’ bottom serving as the lower plate); 2 Rotating glass panel [60 mm diameter (cell bearing)]; 3 Titanium axis. b4 Liquid medium (red). c5 Reversed upper petri dish. d6 Gearwheel with set screw. e7 Closing; 8 Electronic motor device and adjusting ring with additional set screw : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant
- Fig. 2. Side view of a computerized simulation, showing the flow chambers’ lower compartment and the flow profile in between the two plates; shearing gap and bottom plate are shown on the left side; rotation speed = 200 rpm; colour code bar (left edge) showing shear force values [Pa] [1 Pa = 10 dyn/cm2]; flow direction presented by arrows : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant
- Fig. 3. Diagram for visualisation of the calculation of shear stress rates taking into account the centrifugal force and the glass plates’ dimensions. For example, at a distance of 25 mm from the centre of the upper plate, the shear forces’ value is 8.33 dyn/cm2, together with an additional centrifugal force that has a value of 0.55 dyn/cm2 : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant
- Fig. 4. Randomly orientated osteoblasts without influence of rotation (phallacidin fluorescence staining). On the left side with 200× and on the right side with 400× magnification. The white X on the coloured circle marks the location upon the plate where the osteoblasts were located. The red X marks the centre of the plate : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant
- Fig. 5. Osteoblasts with an orientation tendency after 24 h of rotation (phallacidin fluorescence staining). On the left side with 200× and on the right side with 400× magnification. The yellow arrows show the orientation of the cells. The red arched arrow within the coloured circle shows the direction of rotation. The dashed white line oriented to the right stands for the resulting centrifugal force. The dashed white line pointing upwards shows the direction of the resulting flow resistance. The solid white arrow stands for the vectorial sum of the abovementioned forces : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant