Discussion : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography [1]
As grafting materials for maxillary sinus floor augmentation, autogenous bone, which is considered as the gold standard and reported first by Boyne et al. using iliac bone graft, has been used as the first-choice material. In terms of osteogenic, osteoinductive, and osteoconductive properties, autogenous bone is considered ideal; however, the use of autogenous bone places great physical stress on patients because of the need for surgery at the donor site. Synthetic bone substitutes such as β-TCP are clinically very beneficial because donor site surgery can be avoided. Moreover, in the 1996 Sinus Consensus Conference, these materials were concluded as having highly predictable outcomes. Although there are many related factors, no difference in the success rate has been observed according to the grafting material [14].
Artzi et al. conducted a comparative experiment of bovine bones and β-TCP to fill defect areas in dogs. They reported that β-TCP was absorbed within 24 h and replaced by autogenous bone, whereas with bovine bone, approximately 30 % granules remained [15]. Thus, β-TCP is considered the ideal grafting material.
The permanence of the new bone formed within the maxillary sinus has been primarily evaluated in humans using radiography. The clinical assessment and short-term and long-term investigations have also been conducted using panoramic radiography and conventional CT [8–12]. Panoramic radiography analysis does not have the shortcomings of radiation risk and expensive CT equipment; therefore, images can generally be obtained frequently. However, its limitations include the ability to assess two-dimensional height, and various magnifications or errors, such as distortion, must also be taken into consideration. In the past, evaluations during implant treatment were primarily performed using panoramic radiography and conventional CT. Recently, however, the use of preoperative and postoperative CBCT has gained popularity, and radiographic assessment by CBCT for volumetric changes in graft bone in maxillary sinus floor augmentation has also been reported [16]. According to our radiographic analysis by CBCT of dental implantation using β-TCP in the present study, we found that the graft volume decreased over time, both at 6 months after surgery and even at 2.5 years after surgery. The result of 54.9 % graft volume change of 2.5 years after surgery is similar to previous reports [17]. Loads were applied to the implant only 6 months after surgery. Nevertheless, the results suggested that it is difficult to control maxillary sinus pneumatization by exerting implant occlusive load. Zijderveld et al. conducted a 5-year radiographic study using panoramic radiography to evaluate periodic changes in β-TCP [20 patients: 10 patients with autogenous bone (taken from the mental region) and 10 patients with β-TCP]. They reported that the majority of β-TCP absorption occurred within the first 7.5 months and that very little change was observed after 1.5 years [12]. Furthermore, in 2004, Hatano et al. used a 2:1 mixture of autogenous bone-to-bovine bone and reported that the maxillary sinus floor was situated at the same height or lower than the implant tip in most patients [11]. These results are similar to our study that maxillary sinus pneumatization continues to progress ≥1 year after surgery; it stabilizes 3 years after surgery and the implant tip protruded beyond the maxillary sinus floor in approximately 70 % implants (41/58 implants) in patients who were followed up 2.5 years after surgery. However, there were no clinical abnormalities, such as maxillary sinusitis. With regard to liner valuables (RBH, IL, SW, iBH) in the present study, the results suggested that it is difficult to control maxillary sinus pneumatization. There was no significant difference in the change in bone height according to SW, and this result is inconsistent with previous reports [18]. There was a limited number of subjects in this study; we believe it is necessary to conduct long-term tests of larger numbers of subjects in the future.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- Background : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography [1]
- Background : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography [2]
- Methods : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography [1]
- Methods : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography [2]
- Methods : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography [3]
- Results : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography [1]
- Results : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography [2]
- Discussion : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography [1]
- Discussion : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography [2]
- Conclusions : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- References : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography [1]
- References : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography [2]
- Acknowledgements : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- Author information : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- Additional information : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- Rights and permissions : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- About this article : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- Table 1 Age groups of the 30 patients : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- Table 2 Observation period : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- Table 3 The number of implants according to site : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- Table 4 The distribution of CBCT examination after 2.5 years : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- Table 5 Radiographic examination of BV (volumetric changes in graft bone over time) : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- Table 6 Radiographic examination of BH (changes in bone height surrounding the implant) : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- Table 7 The radiographic measurements of liner parameters at immediately after surgery (RBH, IL, SW) : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- Table 8 Examination of the impact of RBH, IL, SW, and iBH in the height from the implant tip to the bone integration site (BH) : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- Fig. 1. Treatment protocol for the present study. Postoperative CBCT was performed a minimum of three times, i.e., immediately, 6 months, and 2.5 years after implant placement : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sin
- Fig. 2. Radiographic examination of the volume of the bone graft (BV): Calculation of area on the frontal plane prior to and immediately after surgery using polygon tool. The polygon tool is included in the CT device, which was dragged around the perimeter of the target site to measure area. Graft volume calculation method (sum of the area and calculation of volume). Volume cm3 = area cm2 × n (number of images) : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sin
- Fig. 3. Radiographic examination of the height of the bone surrounding the implant (BH): Measurement of changes in the height of the implant tip to the bone fixation part over time in the frontal plane: the distance measured from the intersecting point of the long axis of the implant and the maxillary sinus floor to the implant tip: +maxillary side, −alveolar crest side. The liner valuables: residual bone height (RBH), implant length (IL), and width of sinus (SW) : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sin
- Fig. 4. Clinical findings of the second surgery on biopsy at 6 months. The degree of residual grafting materials varied depending on the patient. a most of the β-TCP remained. b Replacement of the β-TCP by new bone had progressed : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sin
- Fig. 5. Radiographic examination (long-term changes in bone height surrounding the implant) n = 20 Number of implants. A total of 5 CBCT scans were taken prior to surgery, immediately after surgery, 6 months after surgery, 1–2 years after surgery, and 3–5 years after surgery : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sin
- Fig. 6. Radiographic examination: The relationship between changes in the maxillary sinus floor associated with a reduction in the grafted bone and the implant tip (a immediately after surgery, b 5 years after surgery) : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sin