Methods : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography [2]
In the present study, we used the superior spatial resolution of CBCT to measure changes over time in (a) the volume of the bone graft (BV) and (b) the height of the bone surrounding the implant (BH).
The method of calculating the volume of the implant site is shown below (Fig. 2).
The slice thickness (voxel value) was resized (0.146 mm → 1 mm) to derive the volume of the grafting agent on the basis of CBCT data. After setting the slice interval to 1 mm and specifying the output range (FOV option), the DICOM server for storing data was selected and registered.
Next, image data of four time axes from prior to surgery, immediately after surgery, 6 months after surgery, and 2.5 years after surgery was simultaneously imported into a multi-data image analysis system. For confirming that the four images had the same positional relationship, we implemented synchronized scrolling after identifying similar anatomical reference points. The area of the implant site was measured using the polygon tool which was dragged around the perimeter of the target site to measure area. It allows measurements up to two places after the decimal point. It is operated by dragging the cursor only around the bone graft material site and avoiding the implant itself. In cases in which it was impossible to determine the margin between the implanted bone and the existing bone after 1-year examination, the entire bone was measured and the preoperative measurement was subtracted from the postoperative measurement.
Then the images were taken at 1-mm increments mesio-distally, and the volume was calculated by adding the entire area of the bone grafting material. BoneVolume (BV) cm3 = area cm2 × N (number of images)
The method of measuring the height of the bone surrounding the implant (BH) is described below (Fig. 3).
The measurements were taken at the long axis of the implant and on the frontal plane of the perpendicular frontal plane. In the event that there was grafted bone above the implant, the distance was measured from the point of intersection of the line connecting the buccal and palatal side of the maxillary sinus floor and the medial axis of the implant to the implant tip (+mm). Moreover, in the event that absorption of the grafting material exceeded the implant tip, the distance was measured from the point of intersection of the medial axis of the implant and the line connecting the most apical part of the grafted bone-to-implant contact (BIC) to the implant tip (−mm). In addition, the liner valuables (RBH, SW, IL) that may effect the outcomes of BH were measured. The following are the explanations of the linear valuables.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- Background : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography [1]
- Background : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography [2]
- Methods : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography [1]
- Methods : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography [2]
- Methods : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography [3]
- Results : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography [1]
- Results : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography [2]
- Discussion : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography [1]
- Discussion : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography [2]
- Conclusions : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- References : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography [1]
- References : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography [2]
- Acknowledgements : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- Author information : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- Additional information : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- Rights and permissions : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- About this article : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- Table 1 Age groups of the 30 patients : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- Table 2 Observation period : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- Table 3 The number of implants according to site : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- Table 4 The distribution of CBCT examination after 2.5 years : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- Table 5 Radiographic examination of BV (volumetric changes in graft bone over time) : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- Table 6 Radiographic examination of BH (changes in bone height surrounding the implant) : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- Table 7 The radiographic measurements of liner parameters at immediately after surgery (RBH, IL, SW) : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- Table 8 Examination of the impact of RBH, IL, SW, and iBH in the height from the implant tip to the bone integration site (BH) : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: analysis by cone-beam computed tomography
- Fig. 1. Treatment protocol for the present study. Postoperative CBCT was performed a minimum of three times, i.e., immediately, 6 months, and 2.5 years after implant placement : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sin
- Fig. 2. Radiographic examination of the volume of the bone graft (BV): Calculation of area on the frontal plane prior to and immediately after surgery using polygon tool. The polygon tool is included in the CT device, which was dragged around the perimeter of the target site to measure area. Graft volume calculation method (sum of the area and calculation of volume). Volume cm3 = area cm2 × n (number of images) : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sin
- Fig. 3. Radiographic examination of the height of the bone surrounding the implant (BH): Measurement of changes in the height of the implant tip to the bone fixation part over time in the frontal plane: the distance measured from the intersecting point of the long axis of the implant and the maxillary sinus floor to the implant tip: +maxillary side, −alveolar crest side. The liner valuables: residual bone height (RBH), implant length (IL), and width of sinus (SW) : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sin
- Fig. 4. Clinical findings of the second surgery on biopsy at 6 months. The degree of residual grafting materials varied depending on the patient. a most of the β-TCP remained. b Replacement of the β-TCP by new bone had progressed : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sin
- Fig. 5. Radiographic examination (long-term changes in bone height surrounding the implant) n = 20 Number of implants. A total of 5 CBCT scans were taken prior to surgery, immediately after surgery, 6 months after surgery, 1–2 years after surgery, and 3–5 years after surgery : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sin
- Fig. 6. Radiographic examination: The relationship between changes in the maxillary sinus floor associated with a reduction in the grafted bone and the implant tip (a immediately after surgery, b 5 years after surgery) : Long-term radiographic assessment of maxillary sin